46
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EndHD@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago

At ~17 USD a month, you could buy nearly every new song you like that you found that month in CD quality or better.

Start building your own library.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

Buying music outright helps support the artists, too.

Qobuz

Bandcamp

[-] skoell13@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago

Never heard of qobuz before. What exactly is this Hi-Res and why is it more expensive than a CD?

[-] tabris@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Hi-res audio is up to 192kHz sampling, much higher than the 44.1kHz sampling of CDs (number of times per second the input soundwave is sampled), and a bit depth of 24bits, compared to CDs 16bit (value of the sample). This produces much larger file sizes, but also better definition to the sound of those songs. If you're listening on high quality audio equipment, you will notice this difference.

[-] skoell13@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the explanation. So I guess they have access to the original files then?

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, they are essentially the master files that would normally be downsampled to 16-bit fit on a standard CD. However, the audiophile industry is plagued by snake oil salesmen and relies heavily on the placebo effect to sell people fantastically overpriced equipment.

When the original engineers chose 44.1 KHz @ 16-bit as the CD standard, they did so because this allows the excess information that was originally recorded to be discarded without it impacting how it sounds to the human ear. If you are interested in reading an explanation of why there is every reason to be skeptical of hi-res audio, read this article by an engineer who worked on the FLAC and Vorbis digital audio formats.

[-] skoell13@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago

Thank you for the explanation. Yes I'm sure that I won't hear a difference even though I have good headphones and speakers. I was just curious and didn't know they would have access to the master files

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago

If you're interested, Qobuz has a free trial to their streaming subscription.

They don't have as good an interface as others or good recommendations, but the library is pretty good. Besides some more obscure stuff, they have everything I love.

And if you're interested in keeping stuff offline, there's a few Python scripts that use their API to download the high quality files. Makes it pretty trivial to make a library of offline, high-res music.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Apple Music stayed the same price and Tidal** lowered its Hi-Fi tier to match Apple's pricing. Fuck Spotify.

[-] Pyotr@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Spotify is absolutely the best advertising that competing services like Tidal could ask for. For the same cost as current Spotify (11$/mo) you can pump to Tidal for the same cost and get HiFi already! Bonus addition: you loose the superfluous non-music content that's slowly taking over at Spotify.

[-] GodIsNull@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

If it will be released one day, far in the future...

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

Enshittification

1301 readers
1 users here now

What is enshittification?

The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source

The lifecycle of Big Internet

We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.

Embrace, extend and extinguish

We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS