352
submitted 1 year ago by TheTango@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mr_Buscemi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 135 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That title hides the worst part.

The cops arrested him and then said social services was coming to take his son who was with him at the time. Then the cop was told the charges wouldn't stick and still did it.

Fucking disgusting to terrify a child like this.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

Let me guess, a month of paid vacation for the cop?

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 96 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If the reason to have speed traps is to get people to reduce their speed then that guy was literally getting people to reduce their speed.

The police need reformed because they try to get people to do bad as a way of making money.

That makes society literally worse instead of better.

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Pretty telling that they're not really about safety when officers will speed after someone at 100+ cause they got their feefees hurt in the exact same area the speed trap is.

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean if the police wanted to enjoy their job they each would get a day to park a cruiser up the street ... and then change into civilian clothes and sit in a lawn chair up the street drinking a beer smoking a cigar holding a sign saying "speed trap ahead" and then calling in anyone that ignores it with it being tracked by the squad car's camera.

that would be how you police if you want to have fun.

(this is my most brilliant idea ever. and i yield it freely to law enforcement)

load more comments (38 replies)
[-] WowSuchInternetz@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

Improper use of hand signal charge for the middle finger made me chuckle. Two first amendment infringements in one encounter though? This officer needs to learn what the first amendment is and how it works.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 year ago

The cop knew it was bull shit. He wanted to inconvenience the guy.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

"Douglas is heard saying that even if the charge would be dropped, it at least “inconvenienced” Guessford."

They should get charged for inconveniencing the court

[-] philomory@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that’s actually genuinely funny. The rest of it is fucked.

[-] deconstruct@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago

Power tripping assholes.

“You can’t do that,” Popp tells Box. “That will be dropped.”

“Yeah, it’s gonna get dropped,” Box replies. “I told (Douglas) it’s definitely going to get thrown out. … I said, ‘Ah, that’s not really going to fly, buddy.’”

Douglas is heard saying that even if the charge would be dropped, it at least “inconvenienced” Guessford.

[-] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 10 points 1 year ago

"You can beat the rap but you can't beat the ride", in other words.

[-] Count0@lemmy.villa-straylight.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't understand why he didn't go after Box himself. The recording demonstrated that he was violating his civil rights, and knew it wouldn't be upheld. That should have gotten rid of his qualified immunity.

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
352 points (98.9% liked)

News

22851 readers
3474 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS