340
That was always the point. Rich people get to have abortions and live consequences free lifes, while poor people have to raise kids/workers to keep the machine well oiled. I'm so glad I'm not from the USA hahaha.
The clinics should start charging a huge out of state fee, that's means tested with a subsidy. Out of state and rich? Pay up.
Most of these women will skew young and have very little political power despite their wealth on paper. If they're actually rich then the price they pay will be capped by scab doctors worldwide.
Well, we already had "medical vacations" and "dental vacations" mostly to save money in another state or country. This shouldn't be surprising.
people caravan to Canada all the time to get cheap insulin. Or more frequently do a 'I fly you buy' type arrangement; with lots of people and people rotating through who runs to get it.
just wait until there are no more legal abortions and they're reporting deaths from trying to self-abort.
It’s only a migrant caravan if they’re brown didn’t you hear?
They'll spin it as "Air travel has been on an upward tick!"
I feel bad for laughing at this lol
Make reimbursement for travel, lodging and food mandatory for insurance to pay out.
Watch 24hr waiting periods, unnecessary ultrasounds and selective state level healthcare bans lose a shit ton of funding and support.
I wonder if there are any stats on travel patterns pre-Roe?
I doubt it. Plus, the population has increased so much since then that the numbers are undoubtedly smaller.
I’ve heard pre-Roe stories of docs and nurses running illegal clinics after hours where they kept no records. So that complicates things.
Yeah, I was assuming if there were any kind of data, it could be extrapolated from somewhat in order to predict how many people would be traveling and roughly how far, given:
- As you point out, different population sizes pre-Roe vs. now.
- Where the free states are now vs. pre-Roe.
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
340 points (99.7% liked)
politics
19104 readers
1979 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS