211
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

On Tuesday, a Virginia appeals court fully absolved Marvin Grimm Jr. of the 1975 crime, saying that new evidence had dismantled the state’s original case against him.

On a Saturday afternoon in 1975, a 3-year-old boy wandered into the woods behind the apartment complex where he lived in Richmond, Va. 

Four days later, the toddler’s body was found floating in shallow water in the James River, fully clothed, arms folded across his chest, nine miles from home.

From there, the horror only grew: Forensic experts told the police that the boy had a gob of semen in the back of his throat and determined that he had been strangled during a sexual assault. Alcohol and a muscle relaxant were found in his blood, according to court documents.

About a month later, in December, the police arrested Marvin Leon Grimm Jr., a 20-year-old Navy veteran, picking him up after his shift at a carpeting company and questioning him for nine hours. Mr. Grimm, who had no criminal record, lived across the hall from the boy’s family and had argued with them over minor issues like toys that were damaged by his lawn mower. He was married, and his first child, a son, had been born 10 days before his arrest.

Much of the key evidence that linked Mr. Grimm to the killing was the work of Mary Jane Burton, a senior analyst at Virginia’s crime lab who died in 1999.

...

But in a recent podcast investigation of Ms. Burton’s work, a whistle-blower revealed that she had tried to alert officials that Ms. Burton was cutting corners and falsifying results, and an independent expert said that the serology evidence that Ms. Burton had analyzed in one of her own cases excluded the man who went on to be convicted of the crime. The podcast also noted that there were several accounts of shoddy work by Ms. Burton, and a perception that she favored the prosecution.

The podcast, “Admissible: Shreds of Evidence,” has triggered state reviews of about 4,800 cases handled by Ms. Burton. But the Grimm case was still jarring, said Tessa Kramer, the journalist who produced it.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ralphio@lemmy.world 103 points 4 months ago

Mr. Grimm pleaded guilty in exchange for an agreement that prosecutors would not seek the death penalty. But under Virginia law at the time, the crime was not eligible for capital punishment.

Where was this dude's lawyer?

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There should be a penalty for prosecutors who torture people to force them to make false confessions. This man had his entire adult life taken from him, so maybe premeditated murder would be a reasonable charge. Those bastards are likely dead by now, but even so they should be tried posthumously. And every case they ever worked on should be re-tried since they were not honest people and any evidence they produced cannot be trusted.

Edit: if they presented this information in a court under oath, add perjury to the list of charges

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago

There should be a penalty for prosecutors who torture people to force them to make false confessions.

I think you mean police? Prosecutors generally don't question the accused, except maybe in a trial.

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

Let’s be inclusive and go with “any agent of the state”

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

There have been cases of prosecution withholding evidence that could have helped the defendant resulting in lengthy prison terms for innocent people.

So yeah, prosecutors need to face a penalty, too.

[-] vodkasolution@feddit.it 52 points 4 months ago

I don't even wanna try to imagine what that man felt and I can't imagine what can be done now

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 months ago

With the "pedo rapist and murderer" label in prison too, must have been a nightmare

and I doubt that he's retired now, he'll still have to find a way to finance his daily life

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

This is why its so important evidence can be independantly analyzed and that the State, consequently, should not have any monopoly on the base material to be analyzed and license to authoritatively analyze such content

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

and that you should have the right to have a lawyer and not a clown as stated in the top comment

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 months ago

He has not seen his son since the day he was arrested, and he is not sure if he will. “I don’t know what he thinks,” Mr. Grimm said.

Man, that last sentence is so sad for all involved.

[-] Aralakh@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 months ago

Wtf, his whole life :(

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
211 points (98.6% liked)

News

23265 readers
4125 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS