65
Because of course it has…
Offer: high speed rail to connect the north and reduce people’s transit time
Best we can do: price hikes and fewer seats
The offer was always about capacity rather than speed, something which is clearly desperately needed.
Investing in infrastructure is waste of money when this money can be given to job creators.
Then how do people get to the jobs without any infrastructure
How is that a job creator's problem...
Give them more money to solve it tho!
This was always known to be the result of cancelling by anyone that has been paying attention.
HS2 is direly needed infrastructure work that we've needed since the 90s
We are at capacity on the west coast mainline, this makes everything more expensive, not just rail, as it's an important freight route.
Short sighted
We are at capacity on the west coast mainline
Don't worry, as we continue to price people out of rail travel (poor people were priced out years ago, we've almost cut the whole lower middle class out too, just a little further, I believe we can do it!), fewer people will travel and that'll reduce the hit on your capacity.
All part of our genius plan 😎🍹
And people still think the Tories aren't full of empty promises and enrichment of business friends with public money.
wow it's almost like it was meant to achieve something
£66bn and counting...
They are just serving those who can claim back the ticket money. Mostly, you know, those that use your money to pay those tickets.
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
65 points (98.5% liked)
United Kingdom
4060 readers
150 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS