116

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1076816

In fealty to US foreign policy, Mexico has long refused to recognize Palestinian statehood. Last week, that finally changed, with AMLO’s government officially acknowledging Palestinian statehood and establishing a full embassy in Mexico City.

On June 2, the Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates announced that, as of the first of the month, it had reclassified its diplomatic mission in Mexico from special delegation to embassy. The ministry “expresses its firm conviction that this measure will contribute significantly to the . . . strengthening of relations between Mexico and the State of Palestine, on the basis of respect and mutual recognition, in benefit of our two peoples as well as international security and development,” it affirmed in a statement.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

What the hell happened to the comments in the other thread?

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Some of the comments were going too far down the flamewar route, but a bunch of comments that were neutral were also deleted. I wish we could get a reason from the mods on this.

[-] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

By the looks of things, one or more mods decided to delete all comments in the thread. I don't think that's something that should never be done, but it should require enough transparency to disclosing the reasons.

[-] McMillan@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

That. Mine was deleted, took me awhile to find out what had happened and no info from the mods. Didn't feel right

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Master@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You should be able to view source to see the comment that was deleted but the mods actually edited the comments to read "deleted by mod" in order to hide the reason for deleting the comments. That to me seems like an abuse of the mod log system.

[-] yinonl@lemmy.fmhy.ml -5 points 1 year ago

mods couldn't handle the anti-Semitism there

[-] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What do you mean anti-semitism? Some comments were talking about both current crimes of the Israeli state against Palestinians and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians that was committed at the birth of Israel as a contemporary state, and other comments were defending Israel. You can still see them in the moderation log. When you claim that denouncing ethnic cleasing is anti-semitism you're spitting on the victims of the Holocaust.

You can see the removed posts here: https://archive.is/4VvSP

[-] Master@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Stumbled across that post and went to the mod log and saw everyone banned for 338 years and all of the mod logs show the comments as edited instead of deleted. Kind of stinks of mod abuse. But there is no way to tell because the comments weren't delete they were modified which completely defeats the purpose of the mod log.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think that's what happened, my browser's language is in Italian and I don't see "deleted by mod", but the Italian for it. Though I still can't find them in the modlog so I'm still confused.

[-] Master@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you look at the mod log for that community ( https://lemmy.world/modlog/2840 ) they appear. They just dont appear in the lemmy.world mod log. So it's significantly less suspicious... but its also obvious that c/world has an anti Israel bias. The one guy got banned for 338 years for posting facts that are not necessarily pro-Israel. I can even understand deleting all the comments since pal-israel is such of hot button topic. But the 338 year bans seem like a ridiculous overstep.

Ah well, I blocked the community. If they cant provide unbiased news I've got no room for them.

[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh there’s a community-specific log, I didn’t know, that makes things much easier.

Anyway, they only banned two users and it doesn’t seem they were posting “facts”, one of them commented something that, googling a bit, seems disputed by various sources, and I’m not sure about the other one because they made three comments in the thread but only one shows in the community modlog.

In any case yeah, not really a good sign to ban two people for 338 years without explicit reasons given.

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] zombuey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Being against violent, racist, and fascist israeli action is not anti-semitic. When a white christian stands up and says they want a pure christian nation we all talk about how absurd it is. But when someone jewish says the same thing anyone who questions that obviously flawed statement is suddenly an antisemite. I get it Israel has a long and violent history and much of that was perpetrated by their neighbors that does not in any way excuse their behaviour.

[-] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
116 points (94.6% liked)

anime_titties

1907 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss world news and geopolitics. You can join our discord at https://discord.gg/DtnRnkE

Rules:

Rule 1: Follow general etiquette and common sense

Applies to posts and comments

Rule 2: Posting Guidelines

Applies to posts 2.1 - Types of submissions

2.1.1 Submissions must be links to news articles.

2.1.2 The source must either be the original website or an archive of the original.

2.1.3 Submissions may not be older than 14 days.

2.1.4 The submission’s title may not be editorialised (express opinions rather than just report the news). If the country/countries involved is not apparent, put their names in the title in brackets 2.2 - Submissions must pertain to politics or major events

2.2.1 Interactions, relations, and developments between:

A. Governments: Nation-states, top-level subdivisions, or autonomous regions

B. Major non-state actors: Large multi-national corporations, trans-national unions/institutions, regional warlords, terrorist organisations, major independence movements, or international criminal organisations

2.2.2 Significant internal political developments with direct consequences to their region or the wider world.

2.2.3 Major aspects of the climate, environment and health.

2.2.4 Major disasters, both natural and man-made, affecting large groups of people or wide areas. 2.3 - US/China/India content restriction

2.3.1 The number of paragraphs with more than a passing reference to the USA, China or India in any capacity should not exceed more than 50% of the article. Includes special administrative regions such as Hong Kong, Guam, Macau and Puerto Rico.

2.3.2 Major non-state actors (as described in 2.2.1-B) are exempt from the 50% rule

2.3.3 If it is unclear due to large or inconsistently sized paragraphs, then the same criteria should be applied to the number of sentences instead. 2.4 - Content quality

2.4.1 Submissions must be of good quality. As such, the following content is strictly prohibited:

Advertisements

Conspiracy theories

Personal blog posts

Satire

Debunked/fabricated content

2.4.2 The quality of content will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and is at the discretion of the moderators. 2.5 - Non-English articles

2.5.1 Non-english articles may be posted, but only if accompanied by a comment containing the article’s English translation.

2.5.2 Translation must be conducted by using either DeepL or Google Translate.

2.5.3 Do not use your own translation unless it is being used to rectify errors in the software’s translation.

2.5.4 Localisation corrections (such as figure of speech) should be provided in square brackets beside the original. Rule 3: Spamming and agendaposting

Applies to posts and comments 3.1 - Spamming

3.1.1 A user may only submit 5 posts per 24 hours. Any submissions that exceed this 5-post limit will automatically be removed.

3.1.2 A user can only post if the account has at least 200 comment karma.

3.1.3 Users may not engage in disruptive behaviour or no-value added spamming, including brigading. 3.2 - Agendaposting

3.2.1 Agendaposting is the process of only, or mostly submitting posts that conform to a certain agenda or political stance. This is strictly prohibited.

3.2.2 If more than 67% of recent posts are considered to be exclusively pushing the same agenda, then action will be taken.

3.2.3 Users are prohibited from accusing other users of agendaposting in the comments. Complaints on particular suspected agendaposters are only allowed via the report system, or via modmailing with substantial evidence to demonstrate a said user is an agendaposter.

3.2.4 Agendaposting is reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the moderators. Rule 4: Keep it civil

Applies to comments

4.1 To encourage healthy debates, the following behaviours are prohibited:

Personal attacks

Name-calling

Harassment of any kind

Discrimination, including: Age, disability, ethnicity, gender, origin, religion, or sexual orientation

4.2 Attacks will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the moderators.

4.3 Retaliation in the same manner is also forbidden - perpetrators should instead be reported.

4.4 Whataboutism and similar off-topic deviation is prohibited in top-level comments and replies, and as primary focus of a comment, in order to keep discussions on topic with respect to the contents of the post. Whataboutism will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the moderators.

4.5 Linking to Comments and Posts unrelated to the current topic and to users not involved in the current conversation (excluding mods or exceptionally informative comments shared in good faith) is not allowed. Any unrelated link will be removed and any user suspected of sharing links in attempt to harass or encourage harassment will be permanently banned from participation.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS