543

When you compare Biden to Trump vs. the effects on the Palestinians, were Trump president again, he would not just help the Israelis exterminate the Palestinians, but encourage them to do so quickly- as he's already told Bibi to "finish it". So your dichotomy is more than a bit disingenuous .

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago

If our only standard is not a Republican, then everytime Republicans lower their standards, they lower the only other option's standards too.

It's not fucking sustainable.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

You know I hear people say this and and yet the Democratic Party is further to the left than it was under Bill Clinton. So how does it follow? I mean I hear people say stuff like we keep moving further to the right and the Republicans certainly are, but I see a Democratic party that's for gay rights and that didn't use to exist. I see a Democratic Party that's that's talking about higher taxes on the wealthy and trade regulations and consumer protection Acts. None of that was true in the '90s. In the 90s the Democrats said the era of big government is over. Now Democrats are supporting good government policies. We can certainly support better government policies, and I personally would like to see them go much further , but I can't see a scenario in which the Democratic party isn't further left than they were.

[-] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The democratic party didn't even universally support abortion rights not that long ago.

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

This. This all day long.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

This does not logically follow.

[-] DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago
[-] Clent@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

This is a proposed political idea. It doesn't make it true and doesn't make the statement that are options are reduced unless we all allow it to be true.

If the Republican decide to burn all gay people, one cannot claim to be a democrat because they simply want to gas them all.

We decide where the line is drawn. Ignore the propaganda that tells us we have no control over the process. That apathy is how the window shifts, not because the republicans shift.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The Overton window is a way of framing change in the baseline ideology of a population. It is hardly a “law” or dogma of any kind. On its own it’s meaningless, you can’t just couch an argument in “…because of the Overton window.” It’s also got its valid detractors like broken window theory and such.

[-] DessertStorms@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Lol, I wasn't making an argument that anything is "because of the Overton window", the OP of this thread is literally describing how the Overton window works. You, and that other person not liking or understanding it, doesn't change that, nor the fact that what op described is demonstrably happening in politics right in front of your fucking eyes, and only "doesn't follow logic" if you're aggressively wilfully ignorant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not in terms of pure logic but definitely in practical terms. You don't get far in humanities if you only follow pure logic.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

So is societal which means it's not a person or group but all of us. It isn't just this one thing everyone on the left likes to point out as if that absolves them from having any personal responsibility in the matter.

The concept causes itself to exist by acceptance that it is inevitable.

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 36 points 3 months ago

Remember how blaming individuals solved climate change, too?

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

I'm starting to suspect that Taylor Swift doesn't even care what we think!

[-] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

I remember!

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

Too young to remember how bloodthirsty Hilary was as secretary of state. Member when "we came, we saw, he died tehe"?

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A lot of retrospective handwringing forgets this, or the vile comments that came out during Bill’s multiple sexual assault allegations.

Hillary was not the right candidate to fight Trump, Jeb Bush more likely. After Obama, returning to an establishment candidate was a mistake, and I don’t care if “it’s her turn” after stepping aside in 2008. Politics has real consequences for people who don’t vacation in the Hamptons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It didn't all happen in 2016. Fascists have been quietly diminishing the power of the electorate for decades now. We'll keep on having "the most important election of our lifetimes" until we manage to undo the damage. IF we manage to undo the damage.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago

If we manage to have any more non-sham elections.

[-] doingthestuff@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The problem is fascists, but it is also compounded by neolib Democrats never reducing government authority either, but often even strengthening it, knowing full well that power can easily be seized by the extreme right at any time.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago

Ummm.... Trump will turn UP the genocide.

[-] Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Way more pro Israel rhetoric that any Biden comment but he then doubles down with lots of anti Palestine comments.

[-] Narauko@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

If the choice is between genocide and genocide + fascism, and there is no viable option 3 without genocide, then the argument is still embrace the genocide or democracy ends. The alternative is embrace genocide and who really needs all this democracy anyway?

[-] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah I'm not sure how to take this post. The image is clearly both-sides-ism but the text of OPs post on it appears to be calling that bad.

This posting format makes sense in specific subreddit/communities like /leopardsatemyface or /whitepeopletwitter. But here it just makes it unclear what the intended message is.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

Your dichotomy of saying we have to pick between the Turd or a Douche is disingenuous.

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

As someone who voted 3rd party in 2016 and regrets it. While you are technically correct, the last 8 years have shown that there is so much more on the line than what I was protesting against with my 3rd party vote. I didn't like Hillary Clinton's positions on war. And sure, my vote probably wouldn't have mattered all that much as I live in a very red state, but every time the Supreme Court does some bullshit, I feel a bit of regret that I didn't use my vote to support the best candidate who actually had a chance.

[-] whygohomie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If he had more votes in the primary, then that could have been true despite the superdelegates. As it would be true for any other candidate.

But he/they didn't, and here we are moping over something that didn't happen years ago while the USSC lays the final stones in the foundation for an actual dictatorship.

Bold strategy. Let's see how that works out.

[-] wieson@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago

There are some elections between 1929 and 1939 that would be more consequential.

[-] multifariace@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The DNC failed to put in a non-establishment candidate, so the Republican voters made it happen.

That huge failure continues to haunt this country while the DNC and the Republican voters double down on their mistakes.

[-] humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

Nostalgia is a good tool against anxiety, but it may perturbate the notion of reality

[-] S491@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I love that I get to choose whether Palestinians get the slow death of starvation and disease or the fast death of bombs and bullets

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Also she could do a better campaign

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Given enough time, shitty Twitter hot takes pollute everything. Interesting implication that somehow Hillary might have a less pro-Israel policy than Biden.

Also: She's cray

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
543 points (88.0% liked)

Political Memes

5359 readers
2544 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS