140
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 75 points 4 months ago

I was in the drink it camp right up until

the experts found bone remains and a gold ring at the bottom of the glass vessel. 

It must have been a bone dry white wine though

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Ah, so a full bodied wine.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 9 points 4 months ago

Ah yes, a Soylent White Cabernet.

[-] Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

The original Sourtoe Cocktail

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I've had homemade distilled rice wine before that had tobacco leaves, a starfish, and a lizard in the bottle. It was actually really good.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

That just adds character and flavor. 🥂

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Pfffflt, weak

[-] KittenBiscuits@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Ew, did Beetlejuice put his engagement ring complete with severed finger in someone's wine glass?

[-] weew@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"pourable" is used to describe wine about as often as "theoretically non-toxic"

[-] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 4 months ago
[-] Pechente@feddit.org 29 points 4 months ago

My town has one of the oldest underground wine cellars in Europe with some bottles up to 300 years old. I talked to somebody maintaining the wine cellar and part of the cork replacement procedure that happens about every 50 years is to taste the wine - just a drop though. Apparently it's pretty awful. His colleague said "You have to taste your way up to one of these!" which sounds like bullshit to me. I bet it doesn't get better after 1700 more years.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 34 points 4 months ago

The real problem is once you get a taste for it, only 1,000 year old bottles will do.

[-] sunzu@kbin.run 9 points 4 months ago

Classic user behavior

[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 months ago

taste your way up

More like taste your way down

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Don't tell me what I do or do not want to do.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago

How is it even a wine at this point? Doesn't it naturally become vinegar after long enough?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

When it oxidizes yes iirc. No or ultra low oxygen content means that process is greatly delayed.

[-] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Oxidization is not the process that turns wine into vinegar, it is a secondary fermentation by bacteria that does it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_of_vinegar

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Buddy....

that sometimes develops on fermenting alcoholic liquids during the process that turns alcohol into acetic acid *with the help of oxygen from the air and acetic acid bacteria (AAB). It

[-] LazerFX@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

That means it's an aerobic bacterial process (aerobic - operating in the presence of air, or specifically oxygen in this case). Not oxidation, which is specifically the interaction of oxygen interactions with the molecule to bond preferentially over the existing bonds, "rusting" them in common parlance.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago

It does both as it says in your source boss.

[-] LazerFX@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

The source provided, I didn't read username.

[-] LazerFX@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Ok. But also - no it doesn't.

"The mother acetifies the wine into vinegar."

Not oxidises. Acetic acid is vinegar, formed from wine by the aerobic action of bacteria.

[-] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The aerobic action of the bacteria is oxidative.

They’re not separate processes.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

Well they are, Gram positive bacteria can be oxidative or fermentive and wine has both in the same solution working together to make wine go bad in the presence of oxygen.

The answer was accurate and simple, why it was necessary to get so deep into the weeds I do not know.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

You have to read the sources sources boss.

Wine both oxidizes and ferments and both processes play off each other.

The question was how is it not bad/vinegar the answer to both is a reduced oxygen environment.

[-] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Or an environment without bacteria. I don't think the wine will 'oxidize' without the bacteria, correct?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure about that one too be honest, I imagine over time there's probably a different mechanism for it but I'm not familiar enough to say.

[-] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acetic_acid

Looks like you can create acedic acid from alcohol but you need a catalyst and carbon monoxide, not oxygen.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Looks like a rusted skateboard bearing.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

The liquid is still liquid.

[-] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I save & use all my vinegars (some for drinks!)

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
140 points (95.5% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17356 readers
3 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS