298
Literally France right now (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For those who don't seem to get it:
No, this meme does not mean that you can't temporarily halt fascist electoral victory, but rather that fighting symptoms and portraying that as a "victory over fascism" completely disregard the root cause (as liberalism often does)...

Tho I'm ngl, the NFP seems to be pretty based, at least relative to the usual neolib bs

ie.: Fascism is a built-in function of capitalism and thus bourgeois "democracy". Capitalism turns to fascism when threatened, so as long as you aren't ready to give up the private ownership of the economy, you will not be able to get rid of fascism (paraphrasing Bertolt Brecht here)

sheesh, I often forget, that libs and revisionists actually believe in bourgeois democracy. If you are open to changing your mind I can recommend "Reform or Revolution" by Rosa Luxenburg

EDIT: @trolololol@lemmy.world made me aware of an ebook-specific link

[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

I had to read that a couple of times before I understood what you are trying to say. At first glance, it seemed like you were calling democracy itself bourgeois, but I think you meant it as a specific thing that isn’t actual democracy… e.g. it’s an illusion of democracy because capitalism gives the wealthy the ability to steer the whole ship, as it were. Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.

[-] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm glad you took the time to read and understand it in good faith!

And yes, under bourgeois "democracy" (be it multiparty or bi/mono party dominant) you only get to choose between various representatives of capital

The system and it's laws are inherently designed in such a way, that no matter whom you elect, you still live under the dictatorship of capital

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Exactly that. Capitalism is incompatible with democracy.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

It seems so. Capitalism fundamentally unequal, which is opposite of real democracy.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Found it If you click on author name it only gives you the web version, for epub you need to go to this page:

https://www.marxists.org/ebooks/#ebooksinenglish

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I've learned that using the term "bourgeois" just confuses half of liberals and convinces the other half that you must be a tankie - I just call it liberal democracy and they get it (it does send them into reactionary fits, though).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 94 points 4 months ago

Wait, so are you trying to clown on the fact that France managed to stop their neofascist party from gaining any real hold on power?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 4 months ago

Le Pen is an ignorant bigot but she isn’t acting like Trump so I actually do think NR is figuring out its next electoral strategy/how to capitalize on its seats vs. plotting to overthrow a legitimate election and install a dictator.

Make no mistake, the rise of right wing groups is a major problem in Western Europe and people need to be careful. But France is not on the brink like the US is. Le Pen is not Trump.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 15 points 4 months ago

LePen is much smarter than Trump, she's also very patient. She knows that given the current state of things, she will get there eventually. Her party gained recognition and the right wing propaganda works like a charm.

The victory of the left is good but, we have cancer and I don't think they'll be enough to properly fight it, especially since they have roughly 3 years to the next presidential elections and only a relative majority. The ruling party has already started getting in the way of them forming a government.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No argument here. Which is why I said America is on the brink and France is not but I also specifically said that they are not out of the woods and the right is clearly planning their next moves. What France just did we needed to do in 2016 as part of a larger effort to stop the rise of right wing nationalists. I feel like all of this was pretty clear in my previous comment.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 3 points 4 months ago

My comment wasn't a criticism of yours, more like additional information 😁.

Here we can really feel that something is really not right. Given that France follows the US with roughly a ten year delay, I fear that our next elections might see the rise of something similar to trumpism.

As you said, we're definitely not out of the woods yet...

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

My bad I misread your intent

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ProIsh@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I don't know France policies but Trump isn't the problem. The far right will continue to push us that direction if they have any amount of power. Once Trump is gone (hopefully) we need to keep voting every time. Never stop never stopping.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I’m not saying Trump is the end all be all of the problem, but he is the central figure and clearly super on board with overthrowing the government. If if Le Pen plotting the same thing, then she and her co-conspirators are a lot quieter about it that’s for sure.

I think it is reasonable to assume that everybody on Lemmy knows that Trump is not the only source of the issue. It gets tiresome seeing people repeat this over and over again. We all know there is a much larger issue here and every time somebody “informs people” that there is a larger issue, it’s a needless sidebar that isn’t meant to inform but to correct somebody on the Internet for the sake of correcting somebody and contributing.

[-] ProIsh@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

So we're clear I was agreeing with you. I don't agree it's a needless sidebar though. There's plenty of "trump bad", and he is, but more importantly it's "republican bad" and I'll continue to repeat that until that party is dissolved.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Emotet@slrpnk.net 49 points 4 months ago

This is exactly how it's supposed to work in a functioning democracy.

Where ideally everyone, but at least a critical percentage of citizens is educated enough to recognize the pattern of deceit and false, but easy answers to very complex questions from extremist parties.

Where established parties don't feel the need to pander to the votes of extremist parties by cooperating and adapting points pushed by extremists.

Where the average citizen doesn't feel left out by the system and is tempted to align themselves with extremist parties in order to protest the current reality of said system.

Where the system implements safeguards to not allow the system to be taken hostage by extremists.

Would be nice, eh?

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 17 points 4 months ago

May I introduce you to the idea of POSIWID?

There are more ways to structure a society democratically than with representational democracy. Other, less fundamentally hierarchichal ways of implementing democracy aren't as prone to fascism developing.

[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 12 points 4 months ago

Also fascism is ultimately the grand conclusion of capitalist neoliberal democracies. Fascists seek to amass, consolidate, and wield power. Liberal democracies fail to resist this amassment because the purpose of a system is what it does, and neoliberals ultimately want it to be possible to amass power in the hands of their wealthy corporate cronies. They are ultimately fascists not because they implement fascism but because they are willing to tolerate fascists implementing fascism as long as they get to benefit from it. Obviously this systems theory stuff is complicated. That's the point of studying systems.

Anyway. This was a long comment when I fundamentally agree with you. I just want people to think about ur-fascism, where it comes from, and what to do about it

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 months ago

This was a long comment when I fundamentally agree with you.

No worries. This is a lefty space after all ;)

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 months ago

What they managed to do is pretty cool though. Like yeah all the structural issues remain but centrists working with leftists to keep fascist out of the gov? Pretty rad! Broad leftist unity on the ballot at least? Pretty rad!

I'm pretty sure the leftists know the stakes, don't shit on solidarity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] yozul@beehaw.org 15 points 4 months ago

I mean, stopping fascists from gaining power is a pretty good way of stopping fascists from gaining power. If the government is to incompetent and/or uninterested in running the country to actually fix the issues people are pissed off about it's only a stopgap solution, but a stopgap is better than nothing. If you have an actual plan for how to go about the process of creating an actual better system in the real world starting from where we are then by all means feel free to share, but until then voting will save lives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

That's just the first phase of the fight, in the second phase they get a lot more damage resistance and their moveset gets quicker. Much tougher fight.

[-] Gsus4@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Second phase of the fight is trying not to lose votes to fascists who pretend to be the democratic opposition while trying to enact socialist policies under neoliberal constraints and inevitably making a mess :(

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Green Party cough

[-] BreadOven@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Is there a third phase? I HATE when there's a third phase. I'm looking at you Elden Ring DLC spoiler.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

It worked because the fascists weren't actually in power yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 12 points 4 months ago

Probably worth teasing this apart.

There are:

  • Fascist political candidates

…which can be formally appointed or rejected by voting

  • Fascist organized groups

…which may attempt to physical seize power regardless of political climate, if the physical conditions seem right, but have a much easier time if the political conditions are favorable too

  • Fascist cultural concepts

…which proliferate regardless of political and physical conditions, and can really only be managed through social norms, which are themselves often reinforced at the ballot box

Just because voting only directly impacts the first problem doesn’t mean it has zero impact on the other two.

In fact, it’s really hard to win the cultural battle and cast fascism as a niche extremist philosophy if it keeps almost winning elections.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Fascist organised groups who tried to seize power can not be fought with voting but thankfully they still have breakable kneecaps

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

They can’t be defeated with voting, but they can be aided by not voting.

But yes, I also thank the level designers for putting in accessible weak points.

[-] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 months ago

They do tend to do better when more mechanisms of the state are on their side, though. (But yes that doesn't mean voting alone defeats them.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Tbh, I think the democrats are at least partly responsible for perpetuating this idea in the US, because they benefit from being the adults in the room relative to the republicans. Basically since '16, a huge chunk of their pitch has been "we're not the republicans". They've relied on the republicans being fascist to make the sell for them, and I think that the centrist auth Dems really love it because it means that they don't have to really make any big, challenging promises that would piss off their corporate or billionaire donors, they don't have to walk back any authoritarian power grabs, they just have to point at the fascists and say (correctly) "these psychos want to kill you, I don't."

If the democrats get elected, they get a mandate to just kick back and not implement fascism. If the Republicans get elected, then the democrats get a sudden boost of engagement and cash as the fear fatigue is replaced by real, actual fear. In either case, the centrist auth faction of the democratic party aren't going to be rid of their fundraising cow, thank you very much, even if the cow is actively planning to murder them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
298 points (79.3% liked)

Lefty Memes

4411 readers
26 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS