226

Shell boss under fire for saying cutting fossil fuel production is ‘dangerous’ (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by sabbah@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

The Shell chief executive, who took up the post last September, also argued that poorer countries would bear the brunt of a gas shortfall if they were unable to compete for shipments on the global market.

“What would be dangerous and irresponsible is cutting oil and gas production so that the cost of living, as we saw last year, starts to shoot up again,” Sawan told the BBC.

That's not wrong, but it's from a biased perspective. It is true that if we were to reduce supply of a primary energy source, that the wealthy would continue on mostly as normal, and the poor would bear most of the suffering, with a side of "wealth moving from rish people to even richer people."

His position, though, comes from the perspective of "Because I'm a hammer, that must be a nail." Yes, it is important to be aware of the effects of reducing fossil fuel production without replacing that with another energy solution. A much better way to realize reduction in fossil fuel production would be to make renewable and green energy sources even more prominent, and economically competitive. Giving the world other economically viable options will reduce demand for fossil fuels.

Big oil companies like Shell can either pivot to embrace new energy technologies or risk becoming less relevant.

[-] iuseit@iusearchlinux.fyi 16 points 1 year ago

Considering it powers most of our economy yes it is. But its also very dangerous to continue relying on them.

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doing thing that would be bad, is bad.

We should do this other thing, that is worse.

What a clown.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Its the response of a mafioso - “You want to muscle into our territory? I dunno; very bad things could happen…”

Screw this guy. I bought an ID.3 2 years ago and I’ve not been back to a Shell once. That’s how I vote this guy out of business…

[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have better non earth destroying energy than fossil fuel.. That guy is a dinosaur.

[-] theinspectorst@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

A dinosaur who sells dead dinosaurs.

[+] TooTallSol@kbin.social -6 points 1 year ago

"We have better non earth destroying energy fossil fuel.. That guy is a dinosaur."

So you're willing to give up plastics and electronics, which use byproducts from oil refining? Let us know when you practice what you preach.

[-] Wiitigo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Plastics make up only about 4% of the total oil production.

I'd say oil extraction needs to be reserved for that, long term (hundreds of years). Medium term, reserved for industrial, space, commercial transportation, and rural use only. I cannot believe we're in the year twenty-fucking-twenty-three and we still have non-commercial ICE vehicles driving around metro areas in developed nations.

[-] Talaraine@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Not to mention we have SO much plastic already out there that if every source of oil dried up tomorrow we'd just find a better way to recycle.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 5 points 1 year ago

Bioplastics are a thing, and improving consistently so oil based plastics are not manditory. My PLA printing box deskside here agrees.

[-] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

'Thou sayeth thou do not abide by thy Lord's feudalism, but thy eat food growethed by it.

Alas, for thou art most clearly bested by mine wit!'

[-] Smoogy@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

So spez is dipping into the oil market now

load more comments

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023

226 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39005 readers

1003 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.