68
submitted 4 months ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 24 points 4 months ago

The catch:

Besieged by logging, fires, and pests, this global balancing act might not last long.

[-] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 months ago

This is understated. I live in Canada and the pest danger is already severe. Every dead tree you see in the forests has the telltale squiggly track marks of the Emerald Ash Borer or other bark beetles. Out west is suffering record fires. Logging is the only category I'd be less concerned about here because they are required by law to replace what they harvest.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

The health of the forests may actually be at least partially related to how they are replaced. The ecosystems of clear-cut replacement are starkly different than old growth, because you end up with all the trees being the same age. You don't get the rolling growth churn and resulting undergrowth.

Still strictly better than not replacing them, but it's still an imperfect system.

[-] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago

This isn't as bad as it sounds. In a way it mimics the natural reset normal forest fires cause.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

No, because after a forest fire you don't get the "optimal full growth spacing" that planters are required to plant. You get plenty of gaps and crowding after a forest fire which creates the opportunities for the churning I described. If you look at a freshly replanted area vs a burnt out area 3 years later they're incredibly dissimilar even to someone with an untrained eye.

[-] Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago

I didn't say it was perfectly identical. Ofc it isn't. Floor growth is almost all still there. It is good enough considering cutting is limited to specific locations only, and the alternative is to delete a primary industry.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Alternative planting patterns WOULD better mimic post-fire growth. No need to jump to the conclusion that the two competing ideas are do exactly what we do now or abolish a primary industry.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
68 points (97.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5298 readers
726 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS