239
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 26 points 4 months ago

People in here are arguing about whether the government should be able to allow or disallow protests, i.e. "legal" or "illegal" protests.

I think Denmark has a good middle ground solution to this: Protests must be declared to the police ahead of time, so they know it is happening. Note that this is not an application or an ask for permission! You always have permission, you only have to make the police aware that you are protesting, so they can monitor it and ensure it follows law and order and doesn't turn violent.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

France works that way as well.

[-] Uruanna@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

On paper, but the city will still say "Friday's not good for us, how about next never?" Then the protest still happens but now the police can say the protest was announced too late and is violent while setting a corn field on fire with their tear gas. Which just happened this weekend.

[-] thrawn@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Should be like, two days or more’s warning is the only requirement, they can’t say no. In Denmark, it’s 24 hours but they can prevent it.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Well, there's the theory and the practice...

[-] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You always have permission*

* terms and conditions may apply

[-] turtlepower@lemm.ee 24 points 4 months ago

Protestation IS democracy you fucking fascists.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 15 points 4 months ago

Guys, I'm planning to cause a traffic jam, and you all are invited.

Oh wait, that's just normal traffic. Oh well, see y'all in jail.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 months ago

It is not acceptable anywhere. This "in a democracy" bit is just taking away blaim from dictator who do this kind of stuff all the time.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

No, the point of the sentence isn't to take away blame. It is to compare them to dictatorships. I.E. Add more blame

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
239 points (97.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
502 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS