50
submitted 1 year ago by zhunk@beehaw.org to c/space@beehaw.org
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zhunk@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

That's a heck of a rideshare!

I'm so here for this moon cavalcade, and that's the less interesting mission of the two. Best of luck to JAXA.

[-] odium@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

What's up with all the moon landings lately? Russia and India were just in the news last week about their attempts at Moon landings.

[-] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago

There was a killer sale at the space parts store the ither day

[-] zhunk@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

And don't forget the Japanese Hakuto-R crashing last December. And we'll start finding out soon if the new batch of American CLPS landers will work.

As far as why - I have no idea why there are so many all of the sudden. For some reason the US and China are working on crewed moon landing programs and making a platoon of non-crewed landers to go with them. And for some reason Japan, India, and Israel all want in? And Russia wants to try to be relevant? I don't get why, or why now, but at least it's exciting.

[-] TheCalzoneMan@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure this has something to do with using the Moon as a jumping-off point to the rest of the solar system. Assuming we can get a functioning colony on the Moon, it will be significantly easier and cheaper to get to Mars and potentially other planets as well. This might just be something I heard from a friend of a friend though, so don't quote me on it.

[-] zhunk@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

so don't quote me on it.

It'll definitely help develop technology that'll be useful for outer solar system missions.

It doesn't make sense as a stop between the Earth and Mars. You have to slow down to enter orbit, then speed back up to leave it. That's a waste of fuel unless there's a good reason to stop there, like for fueling or assembly, but it makes more sense to do that in Earth orbit using distributed life.

[-] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At least to some extend it is a subsidy program to prop up or maintain a national launch fleet against stiff commercial competition (SpaceX) and to renew the local expertise to keep the ageing fleet of ICBMs going. The moon was and is a convenient excuse to waste tax money on this. Japan is one of the cases of ramping up a thinly veiled threat of nuke delivery capacity without officially saying so.

[-] zhunk@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I dunno about this take in this case. Most of the US CLPS landers are launching on Falcons. Literally all but 1 so far. PPE/HALO will launch on a Falcon Heavy. Gateway Logistics will launch on Falcons. The HLS options will launch on Starship and New Glenn. SLS will never fly a commercial flight, and Northrop is already getting big ICBM contracts.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)

Space

7242 readers
1 users here now

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS