713

Today I posted a picture of a stamp with an animal in it and they said the picture contained nudity and made me take it down, but I reported a photo of a guy with a fully visible swastika tattoo and they said that's fine.

I'd like to start a Lemmy community with photos of stuff that they refuse to remove called FacebookSaysItsFine.

(page 5) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fraylor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Aksually itsh meta now you plebian

load more comments (1 replies)

I swear to God, I have zero idea what version you all use of Facebook. It's really not that bad unless your friends are assholes.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nudity is an easy one, nobody will be annoyed if you decide to remove nudity from your platform, especially if it's in an attempt to avoid CSAM. Even here most instances accept a large margin of error to do so.

Not everyone agrees that swastika tattoos should be removed from online platforms. It's not even just nazis, free speech absolutists will totally disagree with the message, but still argue that they have a right to post it.

I don't agree that shit should be left up personally, but I also don't think Meta should be the one deciding what can and can't be posted on their platforms aside from the obvious violence and nudity. Crazy thing is they actually agree. They've been lobbying governments to regulate social media content moderation for ages, but nobody will touch it and look like they're going after "free speech".

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
713 points (95.6% liked)

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

6470 readers
1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS