407

Dallas Black Dance Theatre terminated its entire company of dancers Friday, according to a statement posted on social media by the labor union representing the dancers. A national organizer for the union confirmed Saturday that nine dancers were impacted.

A statement jointly posted on Instagram by the American Guild of Musical Artists and an account run by DBDT dancers responded to the company’s actions: “AGMA is aware that Dallas Black Dance Theatre (DBDT) leadership just terminated all their dancers, and we are appalled. This abrupt and shocking development is the latest in a series of actions the Company has taken since the dancers voted unanimously to unionize.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 123 points 3 months ago
[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 129 points 3 months ago

It is per the National Labor Relations Act. It's up to the NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) to enforce it and they typically don't fuck around.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Is it illegal? My understanding was that the union means the employers only option to terminate was to indiscriminately terminate them all. It's possible that it's illegal to terminate them for the act of unionising, if that's what you mean though

[-] kn33@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago

My understanding is that the only legal way to fire them for unionizing is to put on a charade of completely shutting down the business, and maintaining that closure for long enough to convince a court, before opening a "new" business.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It is illegal to retaliate against workers for organizing or joining a union. Texas is an at-will employment state, which means it is legal to fire everyone for any reason that isn't explicitly illegal (like sex- or race-based discrimination, or retaliation against union organizers) or even no reason at all.

So the dance company can fire everyone because it was Friday and the sky was blue, and it is not illegal. But they have said that all of the dancers violated some internal conduct policy, so a court will evaluate the policy and determine whether or not they were fired for an illegal reason. At-will employment law exists to make it extremely difficult to prove that anyone was fired illegally, but there is a lot of evidence in this case so there's a chance.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago

And firing people who just unionized is really fucking suspicious. You're gonna need a real good explanation for it, because the NLRB tends to look very poorly upon it.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Texas is an at-will employment state

I hate these kinds of statements. People use them all the time while meaning "well THIS state has at-will employment, so special rules apply." as if it's some unique feature of that particular state.

It isn't. 49 out of 50 states have at-will employment. That makes it the norm in the US. They don't have special rules, they just have the default rules. Only Montana has special rules because it's the only state that ISN'T at-will.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Fair point. I only mention that it is state law because it's a lot easier to change state laws than it is to adopt a federal law.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I live in an at-will state (IL). And it's such fucking bullshit. I didn't even know why it's a law here.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

As I_Has_A_Hat pointed out, it's the law almost everywhere in the USA (Montana is the only exception). But yes it is fucking bullshit. It's a law because corporations are more people than people.

[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago

I just assumed the latter. I didn't realize that wiping everyone out was a legitimate option.

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago
[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 3 months ago

No War except Class War.

[-] don@lemm.ee 40 points 3 months ago

It’s time to start busting union busting.

[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

What is a dance company without dancers?

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago
[-] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And those all suck

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

In places like Texas they used to hang people for unionizing. So I guess this is progress.

[-] SoJB@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago

In places like Texas, we used to have a way to effectively deal with these greedy parasite capitalists who busted unions.

Now the grandchildren of those fighters get down on their knees and lick the boots that crush them, begging for more.

Fucking pathetic, Southerners.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 months ago

Time for a lawsuit. If they open a fundraiser to pay legal bills I'll absolutely donate.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
407 points (99.3% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
193 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS