129
submitted 2 months ago by Lemmling@lemm.ee to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

I am getting the following error after upgrading yt-dlp

ERROR: [Piracy] This website is no longer supported since it has been determined to be primarily used for piracy. DO NOT open issues for it

Does anyone know any forks that still works.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stefenauris@pawb.social 58 points 2 months ago

Wow really? That's kind of a shitty stance for them to take.

[-] laz@pawb.social 33 points 2 months ago

True, but sadly the kind of one they must take to avoid being hit with a cease and desist.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

They know someone will fork it. Playing it safe is smart

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 5 points 2 months ago

Especially when downloading from the other supported sites (example: YouTube) is already against their tos and technically, piracy

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

From whom? The piracy site owners?

[-] far_university190@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago

Copyright troll. They even hit manga reader app. Not even distribute any material, just a reader. Just because can load manga from piracy site.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think a fork will solve anything. I'm pretty sure the reason they did this is to cover their asses (don't forget that it was very near to being taken down just a few years ago).

Further, yt-dlp has implemented plugin support, for this exact reason. I think that's a new feature compared to youtube-dl. You can add your own extractors as plugins, wherever you find them. As I remember there are a few plugins that are even maintained by a yt-dlp maintainer.

If you find this to be ok or better, please consider changing the title to let those know about what's happening who have already read the post, because they wouldn't know it otherwise.

[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 29 points 2 months ago

Can you remember the last version that worked for you? A quick workaround could be downloading an older build off the github.

Still this is extremely disappointing and hopefully someone forks it.

[-] Lemmling@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

It used to work last year 😀 . The debian yt-dlp version: stable@2023.03.04 is giving a different error

ERROR: [Einthusan] 9r1H: 9r1H: Failed to parse JSON (caused by JSONDecodeError("Expecting value in '': line 1 column 1 (char 0)")); please report this issue on https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues?q= , filling out the appropriate issue template. Confirm you are on the latest version using yt-dlp -U

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Old versions of yt-dlp never work for me. Even after a few months, it's usually time to upgrade.

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 months ago

Time to fork it with a non pussyfied version

[-] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago

A plugin for yt-dlp will suffice. It's also easier to maintain.

[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 24 points 2 months ago

Maybe you can find some more discussion and the reasoning in their documentation or Github issues or pull requests. I bet this has been discussed before someone implemented it. Maybe there's also a way to restore the old behaviour.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 7 points 2 months ago

There is, they added plugin support. See my top level comment for details

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

This isn't going to make the copyright holders hate them any less.

But it IS giving the copyright holders less attack surface to bite into. Haters gonna hate, let them.

[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

The most likely explanation is that their previous implementation broke due to a website change, and they didn't want to bother with fixing it. People began opening issues for them to fix it, but now it looks like they're aiding people explicitly asking for piracy, so they can't win (and also I'm willing to bet it fucking sucked trying to support that particular website)

[-] mbirth@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Is that an indirect plea to open an issue for it? We should do this.

[-] Lemmling@lemm.ee 17 points 2 months ago
[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago

Could be a liability for them to have to work on support for those sites when it breaks.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 months ago

Sounds like its time for a pirate fork... maybe yt-dlpirate?

I mean, fuck it, one of the big private trackers could do releases, kind of like how Bibliotik does releases of those tools to strip DRM from ebooks.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

some way to call a custom or 'third party' (not compiled into the program) extractor would probably be enough. then let other people work on ones for the, um, 'problem sites'.

[-] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Right. Site plugins or something.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Fork it and put it on radicle or I2P. The MAFIAA can go fuck themselves.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago

What sites for eg?

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
129 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54609 readers
608 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS