264
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The only meaningful voter fraud ever documented has been by republicans.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago

Seems super easy... You mail in your ballot but forget to sign the back. Here in Oregon, the ballot is sent back to you for correction. You still have to return it on time, but you are allowed to correct it

They want to make it in PA so that the ballot is just pitched.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I imagine this is to protect voting rights no matter who the vote was for?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Correct, the signature is on the outside of the ballot envelope so the actual vote isn't accessible until the signature is verified.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Not trying to take a stab at ya, but is it verified or is it just a check that it exists on the envelope?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

When you vote, in person or by mail, your signature is compared with the registration signature on file.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Which is a joke anyway. Signature verification is something that should be abandoned. People don't care about their signature anymore. Plus, do the people doing the verification get any sort of training at all? Has there ever even been a study to show how accurate such comparisons are?

[-] Pika@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

fully agree, my signature is different every time I sign, my penmanship sucks so I never have it the same, I've never been questioned on it, likely due to the fact I don't have a natural signature

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Though it was a few years ago, as someone who has worked the polls, here is what I recall about the poll operation and ballot collecting process:

In MA, absentee/early ballots are sent out with barcodes that can be mapped back to a central DB. Afaik a maximum of one early ballot is sent out to any given voter. If you lose it, you’re walking to your polling station on election day. The mailed/dropped off ballots are scanned so that they’re routed to the correct voting precinct; they’re given to us on Election Day to run through with the in-person ballots.

On Election Day, we sit there with registered voter lists (the list is sharded, not duplicated - i.e. someone works a-f, someone else works g-k, etc.); people come in, tell us who they are (no, no id is checked, but they do need to give us a full, correct address that matches their stated name); they are marked off as “voted” on the list. Voters are provided with a ballot once they have been found on the list and marked off.

Absentee ballots are run through the machines throughout the day; for every single ballot, we match it to a name on the list, and . If there are any duplicate ballots, that is caught at the voter list checking phase, and is flagged thusly for any necessary follow-up (confirmation, disambiguation, or legal action as necessary) and the extra ballot is set aside (whichever one we come across second).

I’m pretty sure we had zero duplicates when I did it in the 2020 presidential (I feel like I would have remembered that, considering the political context at the time), and iirc we processed something in the neighborhood of 10,000ish ballots.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Rectify ‘em? Hell, damn near killed ‘em!

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

You know, the irony is this particular kind of cheating impacts Republicans too; it's not hard to imagine the type to make such errors are the uneducated rubes voting for Trump.

[-] HamsterRage@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago

I think that the idea is that more Dems use mail-in ballots than Reps. Hand in hand with tactics like restricting the number of polling stations in minority neighborhoods, it's just another component of putting their thumb on the scale.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 7 points 1 day ago

PA is potently close enough based off of 2020 where not counting mail in ballots could flip the state in Trumps favor.

[-] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I feel this way about all the meddling and bullshit that state actors are doing - Russia, China, Iran - are you really fucking certain that this isn't going to fuck you in the ass worse than you've already been fucked? Really?

[-] fubarx@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

And if you use a blue, red, or green pen instead of black, NYET!

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

Can we stop making posts containing the cesspool of a website raw story. Surely there's another outlet that isn't as poorly designed and needy.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Cesspool? It's practically only a news aggregator for other sites. What's your problem with it?

Perhaps you mean Daily Beast.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

I can just do without the annoying popups.

UBlock Origin has never shown me a single one.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

im on mobile, and my lemmy app has its own browser for links

all hail firefox tho

I would go the settings and tell it to use a non-shit browser then. Solves your problem right there.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
264 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3034 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS