143

Uncommitted movement: Trump remains biggest threat, not Democrats (www.middleeasteye.net)

submitted 1 month ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 55 points 1 month ago

“But within the context of our broken electoral college system, we know that voting a third party is ultimately inadvertently supporting Trump”

Wow, that’s going to be crushing news to certain folks who clog our feeds with claims to the contrary.

On a serious note, I am happy that they recognize this and encourage everyone to pressure the new administration next year to address this. Democrats are imperfect but are at least susceptible to popular and organized pressure. The same cannot be said for the GOP or even more especially Trump. And push for some form of ranked choice voting and getting rid of the electoral college.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

No this is a couple weeks old but Linky and Monk are still at it. I guess they will just say the Uncommitted movement supports genocide. Or refuse to address it, that seems like the other likely possibility.

Sept. 19: https://www.npr.org/2024/09/19/g-s1-23736/uncommitted-movement-no-endorsement-harris-trump-2024

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Exactly this. But you'll never find them admitting to it, they'll have amnesia.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

"However, that’s not to say that White House officials or Democratic Party staff have heeded their calls for an immediate and permanent ceasefire, an arms embargo on Israel, and a lifting of the 17-year-old blockade on the Gaza Strip."

The White House has absolutely zero control over an immediate and permanent cease fire, or lifting the Gaza blockade, that's all on Israel to do and they're not interested.

We could enact an arms embargo, which would do nothing. Israel would continue producing their own weapons and obtain more from equally "on the outs" nations.

[-] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 17 points 1 month ago

They have power all right. It's quite simple: tell the nazi that he's on his own. That's it. The moment the nazi loses his "I'll call dad" card, we'll see how well he goes in the territory.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago

The White House was able to bring down a shit ton of sanctions on Russia after the invasion of Ukraine. There iia no reason they couldn't do the same after Israel began razing Gaza.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They could, if they wanted to lose every penny of support from the single most powerful lobby in American politics:

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus?ind=Q05

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago

White House has absolutely zero control over an immediate and permanent cease fire, or lifting the Gaza blockade, that's all on Israel

The white house has plenty of influence over israel, they've just chosen to green light the genocide and netanyahu's regional escalation against the advice of our own experts.

An arms embargo would empower anti-netanyahu voices in israel who could point to his mismanaging of israel's most important bilateral. It would reduce the rate and kind of weapons the idf could bring to bear against civilians, saving lives.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Bibi doesn't give two shits what our opinions are, he's made that clear repeatedly.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

Because he knows Biden will support him anyway. If Biden had some balls Netanyahu would never be able to do that shit.

[-] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's an important point (because as always Trump is worse), but the vast majority of people who criticise the dems policy on Israel already know and acknowledge this. The mole hill of the few people dumb enough to vote 3rd party/vote Trump over this is being made out to be a mountain by people who would rather laser-focus on that small issue than acknowledge that their preferred candidate is supporting a genocide.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024

143 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers

1997 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News