-9
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US is again attempting to draw Vietnam into superpower politics.

I think it's the aggressive superpower neighbor of theirs releasing official maps that claim Vietnamese waters as their own doing that you shameless China apologist.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

China essentially claims all of Asia that isn't India or Russia, including Japan. And if Putin falls I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to sneak some bits off Russia.

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

China claims Vietnam? Laos? Singapore? Myanmar? Mongolia? Pakistan??

You're kind of right if by China, you mean the Republic of China, they have some pretty wild territorial claims pretty wild territorial claims

[-] Sneptaur@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

Write a letter to the editor about it

[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, I largely agree with the facts of the article, but I don't see what part is a "mistake." If you've decided to play the superpower game, drawing countries into your orbit seems like the correct strategy, as does prioritizing ones that have ties to other powerful countries that you would like to undercut.

If they think that "attempting to remain a superpower" is a mistake in and of itself, then it's not a repeat, it's just one continuous mistake that started last century.

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In March 2015, retired US diplomat and Harvard professor Robert Blackwill wrote a policy paper that has become an unofficial playbook for today’s American actions in Asia.

It starts with a remarkable but unsurprising premise: “The United States has consistently pursued a grand strategy focused on acquiring and maintaining pre-eminent power over various rivals, first on the North American continent, then in the Western hemisphere, and finally globally.”

The Blackwell paper argues that the US must “protect its systemic primacy” and spells out how to do it in Asia.

we are so the bad guys

[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

retired US diplomat and Harvard professor Robert Blackwill wrote a policy paper that has become an unofficial playbook for today’s American actions in Asia.

OR this is Chinese propaganda falsely making a big deal about a policy paper from a former Bush official whose been out of government service for two decades and no one actually listens to.

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Chinese propaganda by... Al Jazeera? And besides, do you think that the US isn't trying to flex any power in Asia? I'd also read beyond the intro of his Wikipedia page if you think he's been out of government service for two decades, he's a board member on at least a couple of think tanks now.

[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Chinese propaganda by… Al Jazeera?

It's an opinion article from Jim Laurie, so yes. Fox News publishes opinion articles from Bernie Sanders, that doesn't mean Fox News agrees with him.

And besides, do you think that the US isn’t trying to flex any power in Asia?

Holy galloping goalposts, Batman!

he’s a board member on at least a couple of think tanks now.

Oh shit, he's a member of some of America's thousand foreign policy think tanks? My bad; clearly he dictates US Asia policy then.

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The goalposts are exactly where they started. You're defending America wanting world domination ("systemic primacy"), I'm saying that's a pretty evil thing to want, especially for a nation who's policy has been might makes right for at least 7 decades now.

P.S., you should probably read up a bit on the RAND corporation and CFR if you think they are "some of America's thousand foreign policy think tanks", and you may also want to reevaluate calling executive committee membership and senior fellowship as being "a member".

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
-9 points (33.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS