307

Boeing to cut 10% of workforce, stop most 767 production amid strike (www.seattletimes.com)

submitted 5 days ago by AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today to c/news@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] fpslem@lemmy.world 76 points 5 days ago

I don't like how every news story about the layoffs uncritically parrots the company excuse about the strike, as if decades of regulatory capture, short-term business strategy, and poor engineering and supply chain decisions by successive waves of over-paid executives didn't sink the company.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The Seattle Times is really not a good online paper, it's honestly pretty bad. Maybe it was good back in the heyday of print when they had good streams advertiser funding, but nowadays their front page is mostly taken up by local sports related journalism. It's frankly, kind of disturbing.

They did/do have a really good aerospace reporter who covered the most recent round of Boeing scandals, and broke a lot of the stories, but he's not the author of this article.

I think I might even prefer the Baltimore Sun's broke ass website just based on their exponentially lower ratio of local sports stories on the front page.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I hold fast to the idea that if you want to find the dumbest person in the room you only need to look up the chain. The higher you go the dumber, more outwardly over-confident, and more disastrously insecure and fragile they get.

[-] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 46 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oooh I hope in a few years when they go begging we can all agree that if they are too big to fail, they are too big to be a private business.

[-] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

It needs to be broken up.

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Or nationalized.

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 49 points 5 days ago

That's about 17,000 people I believe.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Damn, how do they have so many people?

edit: Apparently it's 170k total, so 17k fired.

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

170,000 globally, 17,000 laid off. Boeing's competitor, Airbus, has around 150,000 employees globally, for a comparison (although Airbus doesn't have US government contracts, as far as I know, which could explain the larger number at Boeing).

A lot of these people probably have little to do with working directly on aircraft manufacturing is my guess. IT, compliance, accounting, and marketing, to name a few. It just takes a lot to manufacture, sell, and maintain aircraft at this scale I think.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 days ago

Are US govt contracts special that way? Airbus is also a major military supplier, they own Eurofighter and Eurocopter. They also have the FCAS to act as a money pit, and they are apparently the second largest space company in the world as well, they own ArianeSpace among other stuff.

[-] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

A lot of Boeing positions require security clearance due to the military contracts, I'm not sure how that works in Europe but I wouldn't be surprised if they have something similar.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

I think it's less standardized, so it's more of a thorough background check, but I guess it's similar.

I once applied to work at NATO and they just wanted a thorough background check.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago

And this does not include all the subcontractors, for example the engine is manufactured by other companies like Safran which has around 90,000 employees.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 35 points 5 days ago

No mention of them giving $70 million to the outgoing CEO.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 31 points 5 days ago

That's certainly going to stop them from circling the drain.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

So they're firing striking employees? I'm sure there's no way that could possibly backfire for them.

[-] babybus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

That's not what the article says though.

[-] ravhall@discuss.online 13 points 5 days ago

Boeing killed John Barnett

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago

I’m actually more surprised they’re still making the 767. Though I know they were heavily used for freight at one point.

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Nobody wants to make wide-body airplanes these days.

[-] akincisor@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

Well maybe if you ate a little less, we wouldn't need widebody airplanes!

[-] samokosik@lemmy.world -5 points 5 days ago

I do not really see why this is bad. If they can exist with 10% less, why not.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024

307 points (100.0% liked)

News

23161 readers

2751 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world