They really should be touting this more to get young people out to vote. This is a very clear division among young people who want/deserve relief, and which party is trying to give it and which is doing everything they can to stop it.
This is such an easy win for Democrats and yet...
Idk, it feels manipulative to me. All they've done here is follow through on existing policy. I have higher standards for being impressed than doing what you're required to do, even if others before you failed to do so.
Proving that you can and do follow through on existing policy is still a good thing to do.
i meet so many old people under the delusion 'i suffered, so should you'. its so weird as many will then talk about their church in the next breath.
Yea, I went to a relatively cheap college. Tuition was about 8k a year when I started and 12k when I graduated, this didn't include living expenses or housing. I worked on average 30 hours a week and full time during the summers. I left with about 20k in loans. I worked and saved while living at my parents home and paid them off in about 3 years. I was lucky to be in a position to do this, all the while making less than 15 an hour.
Then a few years later when there was talk of people getting their debt forgiven, my mother says " that's not fair, you worked hard to get out of it, they should too." And I stood there in shock, thinking who cares if I worked hard to pay off my loans, it doesn't mean others should have to. I don't want others to go through what I sacrificed if they don't have to.
I didn't pay a dime (other than living expenses) for my tuition. Fuck everyone who is against debt forgiveness. I worked hard to become a software engineer, but do you think I could have done it while working full time at the same time just to pay tuition? Even if I didn't work during college, I would have had to live the college quality living for several years before I would have made enough to pay tuition and living.
Education is the single most important thing for a society to progress and everyone to do better, live better, and create better. Anyone against it? Tells you all you need to know. They benefit from an uneducated population, that struggles on low wages for their own personal profit.
Yeah, I worked 60h a week as a full time student to get through school without loans, and no one should have to do that.
old people
it's ok. you can say boomers
It ain't just old people either.
stupid people exist in every age group. but it's to be expected from kids-- not from grown ass adults
This is a program that existed for a very long time.
The problem with it is when it was set up, some idiot put the loan companies in charge. And thru intentional incompetence most people didn't get forgiveness when they should and the interest kept climbing for years.
Biden had us pay the illegally charged interest rather than fight it.
So we drastically overpaid for forgiveness borrowers should have had long ago.
It's good they finally got it, but so many more could have been forgiven for the same amount of money if we didn't pay all that extra interest.
John Oliver did an episode on it a couple months ago, maybe last season?
Its really hard to be supportive and praise someone for finally plugging back in grandmas life support after they purposefully unplugged it to charge their headphones.
This is a program that existed for a very long time
7 years since the first person became eligible is a 'very long time?'
The problem with it is when it was set up, some idiot put the loan companies in charge. And thru intentional incompetence most people didn’t get forgiveness when they should and the interest kept climbing for years.
So we're just making shit up now?
The department of education made the determination of who fulfilled the criteria to have their loans forgiven. Forgiveness was never based around distributing a set amount of money, but on completeting a specific payment regiment for 10 years with a qualifying employment category.
The first year anyone was eligible for forgiveness was 2017. Do you remember who was president in 2017? Who he put in charge of the department of education? There was a deliberate effort by the Trump administration to sabatoge the program by denying approval for forgiveness on the basis of any minor technical or clerical deficiency they could come up with. Some months literally nobody got approved. Now also consider the kinds of people Davos hired for every role she could within the department. And now the kind of people they hired.
And here you sit, just another asshole blaming Biden and Democrats for mess their predecessors went out of their way to create, because they didn't clean it up instantly and perfectly.
Hey just quick question...
Who set up the current college loan system and set it so that none of that debt could be forgiven even after bankruptcy?
That was decades ago so it must have been some predecessor right? Not someone still sitting in a position of power right?
Yeah, you want to litigate the entire FSLP and talk about the whole picture on how it's affected education and the economy over the last three decades? I'm not sure I have time to write several doctoral theses and a nonfiction book today, however maybe we can start with the fact that student loans can be discharged in bankruptcy. Yes, the courts use a more stringent standard than Chapter 7 and it leaves a lot of discretion to individual judges, but it is not outlawed outright.
It add nuance to the conversation that Democrats have done nothing wrong and only been pushing to fix what other older people and Republicans have done.
Avoiding the reality of Biden specifically creating that policy and supporting it for decades leaves opening for people absolutely to get upset and call shenanigans.
The reality of the matter is that people have very little recourse for handling college debt unless they are literally starving to death and that has been a supported position for pretty much all members of the electorate except for the fringes for decades now.
You call someone else out on making incorrect statements while making them yourself and it becomes apparent it's just ideology at the base not reality.
Edit: and for federal loans not private and up until Biden re-enabled the public forgiveness program was considered a near impossible task to get a judge to agree to. Steps in the right direction but more akin to finally committing to the promises already made and failed for decades. It's gonna sour opinion.
... Isn't that entirely a different issue with just a similar end result that's also being worked on by progressive Democrats, krauerking at lemy.lol
I'd say it's completely related since it was a form of debt release that was alternative and longer existing as a form that was removed. It left no outlets for freeing oneself of specific debt and only that one.
So if, I take away your food but promise to give you ingredients to make your own but then don't do that. I'd be blamed for starving you.
And actually not being worked on since the Democratic party did not regret adding in that forced debt. They like the revenue it brings in for their private donors.
They changed it for federal loans only and it's still considered nearly impossible to get the filing submitted that the debt is literally ruining their lives.
To be fair, it's a little disingenuous to start counting from the time the first person became eligible, as all the rules had to be in place for over a decade prior to that.
You're framing it as a program that's been around for 7 years, when the reality is that it's been 17.
Don't disagree with most of your points, but the program itself has been around for quite a while.
What's disingenuous is Givesomefucks out right lying. But semantics are more your flavor I suppose.
s a little disingenuous to start counting from the time the first person became eligible
No it absolutely isn't.
No, it's disingenuous to count the time a program was, by design, inoperable as functional because it existed on paper.
When does the dam exist? On the day the blueprints are drawn up or on the day it starts filling with water?
The word I would contest is "inoperable."
The system is more than just a retrospective yes or no after 10 years. You have to work with the DoEd to submit paperwork from your employer to make sure they qualify. You have to work with the DoEd to make sure the type of payments or deferments you're doing are qualified. Etc.
There have been government employees actively working with people on this for the whole of the 17 years. This is a program that has, in fact, "been around for a long time" in a meaningful way.
Yes, the Trump Administration did a good awful job in trying to intentionally eff it up. But people were in fact able to get through it.
Right now, I know several people who are just a few payments away from being able to qualify, but can't due to payment freezes with the Mohela cutover and all the legal stuff going on with it. Which, to be clear, I'm not blaming on the Biden administration. But it isn't like the program has made much meaningful headway in the past 4 years either.
And it seems like this is the easier battle to win than general student loan forgiveness. Expand PSLF. Reduce the term to 5 years and reduce the administrative burdens and overhead. Allow a wider range of zero-cost-payment deferments to count as "qualified payments" towards the total payment number needed.
These would be expansions on policy that have been unchallenged for the past 17 years. That passed through both houses of Congress. This is an easy win that would help ease the burden of millions of Americans. Especially teachers who are cripplingly underpaid and often require a masters degree.
There's rarely any using trying to respond with logic to a comment filled with insults..
I explicitly blamed the people who set it up, and that account went off about how I'm blaming Biden.
Logic didn't get them to their current opinion, and logic won't help them understand their misunderstanding, they'll just keep throwing insults and not understanding.
I just report and block those accounts, makes Lemmy a lot more civil when you don't see the worst
Dude. You literally blamed Biden in your first comment.
and that account went off about how I’m blaming Biden.
Biden had us pay the illegally charged interest rather than fight it.
I guess someone else wrote his name in there.
Charging borrowers interest is not illegal. Denying participation in government programs over trivial errors is not illegal. Declining to earnestly help people who are eligible rectify their deficient applications is not illegal. Picking a fight you are going to lose on the merits is not smart. Especially when it detracts time and effort away from the much more immediate and necessary goal of helping the large number of people who are still paying.
Whitehouse.gov - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Whitehouse.gov:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/10/17/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-over-1-million-public-service-workers-have-received-student-debt-cancellation-under-the-biden-harris-administration/
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News