112
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sploosh@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

Schrodinger's fake news: it was only a mistake because he got called out.

[-] st3ph3n@midwest.social 8 points 4 hours ago

What a strange looking dude.

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago

Why do Republicans always look made of plastics? That fake face is so weird

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 hours ago

i guess when your entire identity is based on falsehoods, then it follows that your face is also a falsehood

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 64 points 7 hours ago

It was no mistake, Bret, you obsequious hack. You were hoping to just pull one over on Harris, a seasoned and talented prosecutor, and she took you to the cleaners for it.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Oh, it was ultimately a mistake.

It wasn't an error, no. They intended it.

But it was a mistake.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 15 points 7 hours ago

i don't watch fox, but don't they often get their asses handed to them by non-republicans? it wasn't long ago that stroke-survivor fetterman made asses of them live on-air

[-] IMongoose@lemmy.world 31 points 7 hours ago

Jon Stewart roasted Tucker Carlson about his bowtie when Jon was a guest so badly that Tucker stopped wearing them.

https://youtu.be/GooQwKDMqcI?si=QrH-D3r8D13JiEYt

Stewart also more or less got Tucker’s original show taken off the air because he fucking CRUCIFIED - but in a hilariously subtle and elegant fashion - on Tucker’s own show when he was invited as a guest.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 18 points 7 hours ago

i'm old enough to remember that

funny enough, that was on CNN, stewart obliterated them and the show was canceled shortly after

[-] goonbabygoon@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 7 hours ago

Was that the Crossfire episode? Oof. I remember watching that back in the day. Not very often do you see a guest so completely dismantle the toxicity of a show that it gets cancelled very, very shortly thereafter.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 20 points 7 hours ago

jon stewart is a national treasure. the world would be a darker place without him both standing up for the people who need it and also bitchslapping the people who need it

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 9 points 6 hours ago

He looks like Kenneth Copeland

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 8 hours ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/harris-fox-news-bret-baier-mistake-trump-0c60a912d98d7fb84076037486b9a3bd
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3632 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS