203
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm pro abortion and against the death penalty! Someone ask me! I promise I'm not a troll. I am honestly pro abortion not just pro choice.

[-] C126@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 hours ago

My understanding is that they consider it ok to kill someone who committed a heinous crime but not ok to kill someone who is completely innocent.

[-] atx_aquarian@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

This is exactly how I used to see things when I grew up in a conservative echo chamber.

And now that I recognize a person's right to choose and tend to think capital punishment should probably* not be legal, I'll add that it's not that my underlying beliefs changed, just how I now understand things. Some people do deserve capital punishment. And innocent people should be protected. But personhood doesn't start at conception, a person conceiving has a right to decide what happens to their body, and the state can never be trusted to administer capital punishment.

*I say "probably" because I also think it might be necessary to allow it in extreme cases. My reasoning is that if people don't believe the justice system will adequately punish, they have incentive and no ultimate detergent for taking justice into their own hands.

It doesn't work as a deterrent though. In states that have the death penalty people still do bad things.

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago

But should we even punish?

I don't mean to troll, so let me explain. Why do we punish? I think it's two fold, we punish to deter crimes and we punish to exact revenge. But the fear of punishment doesn't deter crime https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things-about-deterrence and that leaves revenge as the only both intended and actual outcome of punishment.

Is the current costs of running a complicated criminal justice system really worth it, if all we get from it is revenge? Does revenge make society better? I don't think so.

I'm not advocating for anarchy either. There should be consequences for criminals. I'm just not sure what the consequences should be, but punishment is ineffective. I get that we have personal responsibility, and free will. And I'm not trying to excuse criminals, I'm just saying that punishment doesn't work.

[-] ripripripriprip@lemmy.world 3 points 42 minutes ago

I'm all about scientific research, especially when it goes against the grain, but the idea of getting caught being a bigger deterrent than the punishment is just, weird?

If there is no punishment, why would you be afraid to be caught?

[-] whaleross@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

One aspect of punishment is retribution for the victims when there is nothing else and another is to keep people that are harmful away in order to keep other people safe.

Here in Sweden we have a current massive problem with organized crime that are now systematically abusing our criminal justice system that is built on humanitarian ideals for rehab and protecting suspects and criminals rights to the absurd. So yes, in those cases I think punishment will do. Cynically abusing protection measures of society deserves punishment. It may not change those individuals for the life they have chosen for themselves but it will keep them out of making even more damage to society and violent crime against individuals and I honestly see no problem in harsh consequences for their own decisions.

[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

They’re both cruel to anyone “below” them (this is a simplistic argument.) They’re easy to cry wolf about in order to draw people over to your side, people who vote and act emotionally

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

In the end, it's because they're told that that's the way it is.

Abortion makes a an easy political point. Vote for the children.

Being hard on crime and executing people, That's another easy political point. Vote for the law abiding citizens.

They don't care that those two things are at odds They don't care about life or death. They care about their own exact situation, and don't really give a rat's ass about anyone else. They believe that the team they're backing gives them the best advantage, and that's absolutely all they care about. Beyond that, it's simply consuming and regurgitating the propaganda, self-perpetuating.

[-] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

IS it a contradiction? I don't agree with the death penalty or anti-abortion position, but I don't see some essential link between either position. You can hold two different beliefs about two different things is how come.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

They literally call themselves pro-life and then express support for the death penalty.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 3 hours ago

I have the same question for the opposite as well. Or for being for abortion and also vegan.

[-] blackris@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

A (human) mother that carries a growing fetus is a living being. A pig, dog or a cow as well. They feel physically and emotionally and can be hurt.

A fetus is, up to a certain point, just a slab of meat.

As a vegan I don't care about slabs of meat, I care about living beings and I think we shouldn't hurt them.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -2 points 2 hours ago

Foetus can also feel pain and hurt, though

[-] Zoot@reddthat.com 4 points 2 hours ago

At which stage in development, since you seem to know this for a fact.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago

The death penalty doesn't control women.

[-] umt@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 11 hours ago

It's a pastime of liberal pundits to point out that the pro-life governor of some flyover state also supports the death penalty and so on and so forth. We get incredulous and infuriated at their blatant hypocrisy. We call them stupid, which really sets them off [...] They don't think of themselves as self-serving hypocrites or idiots who can't keep their facts straight long enough to form a cogent argument in continuity with the rest of their ideology. We try to describe this as “cognitive dissonance” or other give other armchair diagnosis that doesn't fully capture what's going on. I'd like to give them more credit than that. They clearly believe in something, and in that context their words and actions would make sense, but it's not what they're self-advertising when you ask what they believe in.

From still the best description of american conservative thought I've read: an essay by u/kin7es: https://wiki.dlma.com/belief-system-of-republicans

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Everyone has a spot on the big food pyramid of the socio-political hierarchy. Good, smart, and hardworking people of merit make their way to the top. Bad, dumb, and lazy people go to the bottom. For convenience sake, this hierarchy is color-coded. In a zero-sum world, everyone who gets to the top has to knock someone down a rung to make room.

I would argue this is how republican voters think. That they’re in the right because they are voting for the right of the individual. But on the other hand I think Republican policy makers give zero shits about a person’s self worth and actualization but rather they know that they need to feed the machine and we need the poor babies born to do so, and on the other hand they can demonstrate some form of moral high ground by deciding life and death.

There’s no death penalty for defrauding elections, molding the healthcare (or really any corporate) system to work for harm and profit, avoiding taxation through infinite shell companies and offshore bank accounts. Those things are celebrated as “beating the system”

Still to this day everyone that claims “Plandemic” is chasing some invisible elite power structure that somehow only includes democrats, without ever getting mad at the corporations that profited immensely off developing covid vaccines and charging market price for them as a portion of the world was dying.

[-] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 10 hours ago

Because with reactionaries, the cruelty is the point.

[-] november@lemmy.vg 13 points 12 hours ago

Kind of seems like a contradiction

They don't care. There's no point in calling conservatives out on hypocrisy. Only a very small number of them will give a shit, and those will be the ones who were already having doubts.

[-] TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

Precisely this. From a philosophical-logical POV, it doesn't make sense. From the POV of establishing and maintaining power/ dominance/ oppression/ hegemony, however, it's the only thing that makes sense.

[-] CM400@lemmy.world 98 points 17 hours ago

Just guessing here, but I’d assume it’s because the unborn have potential and the bad guys had their chance. I don’t agree, but that’s what I assume being around some people like that…

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 15 points 12 hours ago

They would argue that the "baby" is innocent.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

So was the guy they executed the other day right? So innocence might not be it either

[-] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago

They're obsessed with punishment. A lot of them see unwanted pregnancy as a just punishment for recreational sex.

[-] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 18 points 14 hours ago

Because they don't care about "life".

They care about punishing people.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

An unwanted unplanned baby is punishment for having sex outside of marriage.

Death penalty is punishment for being convicted of murder.

It's perfectly consistent when you look at it all about punishment.

The cruelty is indeed the point

[-] vzq@lemmy.world 58 points 17 hours ago

As someone recently told me, they don’t worry about saving lives, they worry about saving souls.

You need to abide by the quaint rules of the magical sky daddy for that, even if they don’t make sense.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

Most people aren't all that well informed and don't do a lot of crtical thinking about their political positions on things. Many people are only guided by their emotions.

If your Church says that life begins at conception, then abortion is killing babies. So you'd be angry about abortions happening.

If you hear a horrible crime, you're angry about that and might want the person that did that crime to be executed. If you never hear about or think about innocent people being execute, never consider the ethical problems with a government killing people, never consider the costs of it, and all the other arguments against the death penalty, then you can go through life thinking there's no problem with it.

And even if you hear the rational arguments, they get overpowered by emotion the next time someone says "abortion is murder" or you hear about a horrible crime happening that might qualify for the death penalty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 36 points 17 hours ago

Arguably, an unborn baby cannot be guilty of anything. But an adult sentenced to death is often guilty of some horrible crime. So if you accept killing as a punishment, there is no contradiction.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works 29 points 17 hours ago

Because people receiving the death penalty theoretically did something wrong, and fetuses did not. I'm neither against abortion nor pro death penalty, and I don't really see a contradiction there.

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

That wasn't so hard, was it? People tripping over themselves to find a gotcha and forgetting to use a little common sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
203 points (92.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35560 readers
2010 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS