52
submitted 1 year ago by 5ilver5urfer@lemmy.ca to c/nba@lemmy.world
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I don't understand the purpose of this.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The purpose is to get people excited about midseason basketball. Many fans don't watch any games or care about their teams until the end of the season when the playoffs approach. By then, many teams will be out of contention or obviously outmatched.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

But this doesn't change any of that.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe not. We'll see if anyone cares about a midseason tournament. I'll be curious to see how seriously the players take it. Like will the middle third franchises rest some players and use it to develop some guys? Since the games won't count, and they have little hope of winning, will it be treated like summer league games?

[-] BanjosKazoo@geddit.social 2 points 1 year ago

All the tournament games still count as regular season games so there's no change in incentive to rest guys. The only one that doesn't count as a regular season game is the tournament championship and they win a half million bucks if they win so they're trying to incentivize the players to play.

[-] porksoda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It does for me.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think you'll see a non-zero change in the group stage but it will ramp quickly up. No one gives two fucka about FA cup early stages but top premier league soccer teams consider it just slightly less important than winning the league. I don't think it gets there or that the NBA was aiming for it but hey, don't underestimate the ability of owners to use marketing for fans and incentives for teams to make it important.

[-] koberulz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

The NBL in Australia tried this a couple of seasons ago and nobody gave a shit. It was quickly abandoned.

It's certainly not going to do anything to entice the "why watch the game when I can catch highlights on Twitter" crowd, and as with the proper championship most teams will have zero chance.

The other difference is that winning the Premier League just means finishing on top at the end of the season. The NBA already has playoffs.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I have to agree. NBA doesn't really need it that much.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

This is really cool. I like seeing US leagues experimenting and trying to incorporate ideas from around the world. It'd be really cool if this tournament was invitational, so teams had to qualify based on something, or they get grouped according to some standard. But the current format is still a great idea

[-] 5ilver5urfer@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Wonder if this was a play to eliminate some load management and keep the stars playing.

[-] cavsfan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

500k each for the winners all the way down to 50k for the 8th place team will no doubt bring out some good competition. That's some pretty nice dough even for the max contract guys. Who doesn't want an extra 50k of pocket change? Especially going forward when the 5th place team sees other guys getting hundreds of thousands more than them, that'll no doubt bring out the competitive spirit in a lot of guys.

East Group B is looking to be a bloodbath, same with West Group A.

I wonder if scheduling will cause any weird issues like playing a team 5 times or an intraconference team only twice. I suppose you could have games later in the season against team A or team B depending on who of your group went on to the knockout stage.

[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

When you have contractual incentives that can trigger for millions of dollars that largely are based off your health, I don't see a lot of guys caring too much about this. In fact I can see the better teams purposely losing early in the knockout rounds to just not have to worry about it and focus on what really matters.

Dumbest thing is the two-way guys, the guys who absolutely would need that money the most, only get half of the winnings lol

[-] cavsfan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So I don't see teams purposely losing, since it's not like they play more games unless they play in the final. At which point the different between 100k then 200k and 500k is not nothing. Even if some players or teams could care less about the tournament, I can't see them treating it less than a regular season game at the very least.

On your second point, yeah that's incredibly stupid. If the guys play in the games they should get paid for playing in the games. You're playing in an NBA game against NBA teams in an NBA tournament with payouts to players based on how far you go.

[-] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't have much to say about the tournament, mostly because I friggin love basketball and I'm just as excited about it in December as I am in April!

But did anyone else find it weird that in there s article, in the list of groups all teams were referred to ONLY by their city, except for LA? They got some LA fans at the AP?

West Group A — Memphis, Phoenix, the Los Angeles Lakers, Utah and Portland.

West Group B — Denver, the Los Angeles Clippers, New Orleans, Dallas and Houston.

West Group C — Sacramento, Golden State, Minnesota, Oklahoma City and San Antonio.

East Group A — Philadelphia, Cleveland, Atlanta, Indiana and Detroit.

East Group B — Milwaukee, New York, Miami, Washington and Charlotte.

East Group C — Boston, Brooklyn, Toronto, Chicago and Orlando.

EDIT: Duh, I totally ignored the Clippers, which is extra special because they're literally in the next group down 🤦‍♂️

[-] mephiska@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That’s because there are two teams in LA, the Lakers and the Clippers. Technically NY has two teams but the nets go by their borough Brooklyn.

[-] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're absolutely right, I totally missed that!

[-] FrozenH@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

They have to distinguish between the Clippers and Lakers somehow.

[-] BrerChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're totally right. Like everyone else, I was informing the Clippers!

[-] Ph0mX@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

No worries. I bet most LA basketball fans forget the Clippers exist too

[-] coygsu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The incentives are limited. I think a significant addition to the cap space and a playin tournament guarantee (if not in the playoffs) would make the games more competitive. Otherwise this is just rebranded regular season basketball.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
52 points (96.4% liked)

NBA

5093 readers
10 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS