585
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] No_Support_8363@lemm.ee 1 points 19 minutes ago

Thats not good :(

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 58 points 5 hours ago
[-] john117@lemmy.jmsquared.net 11 points 2 hours ago

oh thank god

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 50 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

600 upvotes and only 10 downvotes on literal fake news. I wish readers were less lazy, it’s very frustrating.

Edit: made my statement a bit less toxic. I was mad.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago

No one is listening I'm sorry to say. I corrected a couple people but then realized it was pointless. The discussions in the crossposted communities (which - holy shit I don't think I've seen something so thoroughly spammed across multiple tech communities before) are just as bad or worse.

[-] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Community is fine, your comment is at the top, along with others pointing this out.

It’s the “non-community” if you will boosting this. The passerby’s not reading comments.

[-] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 6 hours ago

can we start reading the articles and not just the headlines??? it literally says it's a packaging bug

[-] 486@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

It is really not just a packaging bug. If you read that comment of the Bitwarden person a little further, you'll notice that he's talking about that proprietary "SDK" library that they are integrating with their clients. Even if they manage to not actually link it directly with the client, but rather let the client talk to that library via some protocol - it doesn't make the situation any better. The client won't work without their proprietary "SDK", no matter if they remove the build-time dependency or not.

[-] cmrn@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

…in the update that came out after this article was posted and the discussion took place.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

In general, if it's Phoronix, I assume the headline is a bit more exaggerated. They put out pretty good content, but they also put out a lot of content, so the editing can be a little lacking IMO.

[-] ealoe@ani.social 13 points 6 hours ago

Some guy at bitwarden clicks a button wrong on a license drop-down option and all these people crawl out of the woodwork to declare the end of bitwarden being trustworthy. Nothing in the article or the company's statements indicates an actual move away from open source. Big nothingburger

[-] 486@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago

Maybe you want to read the comment by kspearrin in that Github issue again. They are clearly moving away from open source. He explicitly states that they are in the process of moving more code to their proprietary "SDK" library.

[-] mli@lemm.ee 33 points 8 hours ago

Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it's a "packaging bug" and that "Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model."

According to Bitwardens post here, this is a "packaging bug" and will be resolved.

[-] ArkyonVeil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 hours ago

I wonder~ I wonder~ I wonder whyyyy...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
585 points (89.5% liked)

Technology

58795 readers
2876 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS