1828
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mojave@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago

Man we had someone in the army do this. Army doctrine is either outdated or very accessible to the poor, I don't fuckin know, but you aren't required to have a phone.

So this one weird junior Joe just decided he didn't need a phone. Got rid of it, and as a result never got the information he needed on army shit. I loved him for it, and by the law he was in the right. Can't tell him to get a phone.

Unfortunately I was his team lead, and every time my chain of command decided to put out bullshit last minute information over text I had to tell them to suck it and pvt NoPhone wouldn't be at their surprise formation.

Sometimes for important stuff I would have to drive to the barracks and knock on homies door to let him know there's surprise inspections or piss tests and shit.

The workplace should operate entirely without external communication. It worked since the dawn of man, and it should continue to work until the end of man if we want any semblance of work-life balance.

[-] bekopharm@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago

pvt NoPhone

Love this bit. Gonna steal it :D

[-] Vorticity@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

If I had to guess, the reason for the lack of a phone requirement is that, if the army required everyone to have phones, the army would need to pay for them, too. I'm sure the army loves spending money on things like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Southern_Yankee@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

As retired Army, this is freakin' phenomenal. I hope that dude is doing well today.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 day ago

Why did you, why would you, ever have work email and Teams on your phone in the first place?

[-] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

To prep my day. As a late shift I want to know what I am walking into rather than be anxiety ridden for my 4 hours of day light. That being said I don't respond I just check to see what is happening

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Personally, I had Slack then teams mobile for work because I didn't mind helping outside normal work hours on one off stuff.

At my last job I managed a team of developers in India (while residing in the US). It was pretty much necessary for me to be available outside of my company's normal work hours. I always compensated myself for middle-of-the-night activity with time off during the day and nobody ever mentioned having a problem with it. I was eventually rewarded by being laid off with everybody else when my company was acquired by a west coast tech giant.

[-] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Got me in the first half

[-] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 180 points 2 days ago

Our boss was freaking out over people sometimes doing some private calls during work hours and at a certain point absolutely forbade it. So yeah, people would just end the call at 17:00 sharp and switch off the work phone. It took one week before that rule was rescinded.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 101 points 2 days ago

This reminds me of a work-to-rule or a "White Strike." It turns out that every company, even those that supposedly operate off of "unskilled" labor, utterly rely on employees making a ton of judgment calls and often working outside their job description. When employees start working to the letter of their job description, the whole operation quickly grinds to a halt.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 80 points 2 days ago

Doing home health was kinda instructive for me in this regard.

The only time you go to the office is to turn stuff in, do inservices/continuing education, or similar. But originally I would answer calls at weird hours because a patient would need coverage, otherwise they wouldn't be calling.

And then the management spent way too much money buying into some Disney corporate policy thing (literally, they paid money to Disney for the program) that changed a ton of rules in bullshit ways that made no sense for home health.

So, the next time they called, I didn't answer. Or the time after that, or the time after that. And, when you're one of three men working for a company that's partially reliant physical strength to be able to do the work needed for some patients, this alarmed my supervisor. She requested a meeting, and I went in. Mandatory meetings were paid though!

At the meeting, it was expressed that answering calls was part of my job. So I asked id I was being paid to sit at home and wait for calls. No, I wasn't "on call". So, you want me on call? No, just to answer when we call you. That's being on call, and we're supposed to get paid for that. No, this is different, we just want you to be available when someone calls out for a difficult patient. Soooo, you want me on call.

This went in circles for a while before I switched gears and directly said that answering calls when not on duty was not in place when I was hired, and that the employee handbook specified that being on call was considered a shift, and would be paid as such, and that maybe I should have been on call any of the dozens of times I did wake my ass up from sleep after workout two or three jobs in the first place, and that I never got paid a dime for doing so, so that was the end of it for me.

The response was that they couldn't stay operating if they paid everyone for being on call instead of us "supporting the company". My response was that maybe they could have if they hadn't shelled out for the Disney crap, or if the previous administrator hadn't been screwing around and embezzling, and that maybe it was time the company supported us.

Not surprisingly, I was one of several employees "let go to streamline services" a few weeks later, right before the company folded entirely.

So, you don't even have to have an office job to get treated like shit! Isn't that a relief? Isn't it?

[-] Rolando@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The response was that they couldn’t stay operating if they paid everyone for being on call instead of us “supporting the company”.

That's the heart of the matter. They wanted you to support the company, without the company supporting you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 109 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In all of my IT jobs I would have been fired if I had signed into work accounts on my personal phone. It's a pretty big security risk.

[-] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago

True, but in small companies it's not uncommon.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago

Keep telling the DBAs that my company outsourced a big chunk of their tech stack to that its against company policy to work all the way on the other side of the planet, but they refuse to show up to the office.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1828 points (98.6% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20 readers
160 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS