221
"Yes" says anyone paying attention since 2015.
"Did __________ pull punches to appease Trump?"
The blank can be filled in with the following:
- The LA Times
- Every other media outlet for the past 10 years
- The entire Republican Party
- Politicians in general
- Our entire legal system
Trump's rise to power solely rests on the fact that everybody continues to play Trump's games by Trump's rules and wondering why they keep losing. -
Yep, any of us plebeians would be in jail for life if we pulled the shit he has. He's a traitorous tyrannical shit stain on this country.
Hey look a headline that’s answered with “yes!”
People keep asking why the race is so close. Decades of brainwashing from the right wing infosphere and a lack of push back from out institutions that are supposed to be bastions of democracy are two primary culprits.
lack of push back from out institutions that are supposed to be bastions of democracy
Yes, but have you considered there's so much more money to be made on HORSE RACE?
Why do you hate capitalism bro? Shouldn't billionaires have the right to burn entire countries down if it makes them a few dollars richer?
Realizing how all these worms turn to appease an incoming and fascist government is mind boggling to me. Never thought it would have happened here.
That's the thing about fascism. It can happen anywhere because people aren't inherently predisposed to any ideology. With enough brainwashing and propaganda over enough time anyone who doesn't already know better can become a fascist.
This didn't happen overnight, fascism takes time to take root. In the US, neoliberalism has been pushing socialism out and letting fascism in for over forty years since Regan took office.
We definitely let communism and socialism turn into the new Nazism without much fuss. Most of the modern world is socialist to some extent but none of the George Orwellness the right would claim is a feature of socialism.
Exactly, socialism is an inclusive institution like majority rule democracy. We are headed to an Orwellian dystopia by prioritizing the freedoms of markets and corporations over people. Rather than state propaganda we got propaganda from billionaires. The effect was the same as 1984.
The difference being, despite how flawed it is, we still live in a democracy for now. So we need to vote in record numbers for Kamala and Walz. The Republican strategy is to contest the election in every state, county, and polling place so we need to out vote the Republicans everywhere we can.
If by 'these worms' you mean corporate interests such as all the bought out, dying remnants of traditional media...
... Why would you not expect this?
In basically every historical example of a growing fascist movement, big money sides with them.
The thing is, truth and facts exist whether we believe them or not. The sun is a star and we rotate around it on a sphere.Yet there are people who still believe in a pre-Copernican, geocentric universe.
Facts don't matter when someone tells you something in line with what you want to hear or believe. Trump does that for his base. Nothing we say about it will change or undo the damage done.
Best we can hope for is superior numbers to the degree that the inevitable court battle after the election cannot refute.
In the short term, between now and the election, sure. Studies have shown people reject new information that contradicts an established belief. In the long term, it's possible to get people out of cults and fascist movements. But that takes a level of time and effort we no longer have.
Best we can hope for is superior numbers to the degree that the inevitable court battle after the election cannot refute.
Yes, this is the solution. We outnumber the fascists. We need to show it at the polls and vote for the Harris-Walz ticket.
You either missed my point or are ignoring it. Either way, I hope you are correct.
I mean, I addressed the second and third sections. The statements in the first section are tautological truisms. So I'm not sure what you mean.
I largely agree with your points, just not that there is no hope for these people on a long enough timescale. This was both preventable and is fixable. We just have to give ourselves the time to fix it.
I'm choosing to believe in people. It's the most useful outlook I can have.
Suck on that Betteridge.
Narrator: They did.
I deleted and reposted this because it didn't seem to federate properly the first time.
After a decade of this bullshit, who isn’t guilty of this? Craven bastards
It's shitty... but I get it. We already know the kind of petty craven asshole he is, hedging your bets in case he wins so he doesn't shit all over you is a good play in theory. In practice he'll still do it if you so much as hinted his shit didn't smell like fresh strawberries, so why not go in guns blazing?
Because they're chickenshit
Corporations are putting profits over people.
NPR - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for NPR:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/24/nx-s1-5163293/la-times-editor-resigns-trump-msnbc-washington-post
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
221 points (99.6% liked)
politics
19107 readers
5456 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS