327
submitted 2 days ago by moe90@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 486@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

I was really sceptical of the CTOs first response, but this does actually seem to be genuinely good news.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm nerdy enough to use bitwarden but not nerdy enough to truly understand this.

Can someone explain it like I'm 5?

[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago

Sure. The majority of the BitWarden client is licensed under the GPL, which categorizes it as “free software”. However, one of the dependencies titled “BitWarden-SDK” was licensed under a different proprietary license which didn’t allow re-distribution of the SDK. For the most part, this was never a problem as FOSS package maintainers didn’t include the dependency (as it was optional) and were able to compile the various clients and keep the freedoms granted by the GPL license. However, a recent change made BitWarden-SDK a required dependency, which violated freedom 0 (the freedom to distribute the code as you please). BitWarden CTO came out and said this was an error and fixed this, making BitWarden SDK an optional dependency once again which now makes BitWarden free software again. For the average joe, this wouldn’t have mattered as BitWarden SDK contains features that are usually favored by businesses and the average Joe can live without. So everything now returns back to normal, hopefully.

[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This seems like classic corporate backtracking when their customers spot a terrible, deliberate decision.

That being said, I am happy about it. I got my company to use it and finally got my girlfriend to use it and just recommended it to her brother. Would hate to have to try to find something else

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

This seems like classic corporate backtracking when their customers spot a terrible, deliberate decision.

I didn't think that's the case here

However, would you rather that the feedback of users NOT change behavior? I'm not entirely sure what your end game is here, you WANT corporations to ignore and not take action on feedback?

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net -1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Why do they have to "WANT" that? Ignoring the fact that they literally said they were happy it was changed back, why does that matter to the criticism? If it's true, it's true, and the fact that corporations are the ones in a position to habitually make terrible decisions about FOSS is a big problem. It's valid to point out that it would be good to find a better way.

If anything it sounds like you "WANT" to ignore it.

[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I don't think so, to be honest. The bitwarden-sdk had been there for a VERY long time and you could always compile without it. Not being able to build a FOSS client wouldn't hurt bitwarden's bottom line too much. Most people use whatever is provided in the app stores (which is compiled with the source available sdk).

[-] kia@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

Now could you explain it like I'm 4?

[-] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago

Free software had a non-free extra bit that it technically didn't need. Accidentally got changed to need the non-free part in order to run which caused news stories. Now the change has been reverted so it's free again.

[-] TheOneAndOnlyDeath@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

Now could you explain it like I'm 3?

[-] soul@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Free cookie recipe not really free because oopsie! Man fixed it now. Cookie recipe is free again! Yay!

[-] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

Now could you explain it like I'm 104?

[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Now could you explain it like I'm 2?

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

NO, LouNeko! No touchy non-FOSS.

[-] MrFunkEdude@piefed.social 45 points 1 day ago

Cool.

I just started using Bitwarden almost a year now. I don't know how I lived without it before? It's nice to know I wont have to switch to something else.

[-] darkstar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

I've been using it for years, I'm so glad I don't have to switch

[-] patchwork@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Initially Bitwarden was one of the most impressive FOSS password managers, but their increasing willingness to trade user privacy for services and promotion by our favorite surveillance capitalist's is the real issue imho. Believing Privacy and Security are inextricably linked, I cannot recommend, nor use them at this time.

A quick scan on Blacklight (TheMarkup's Privacy Tool) is an eye opener.

https://themarkup.org/blacklight?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbitwarden.com%2F&device=mobile&location=us-ca&force=false

[-] Rockslide0482@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago

This is an interesting tool that I'm going to back pocket, so thanks for that. That being said, any trackers and such on Bitwarden.com root page isn't really indicative of the real product, though I'll say it reflects poorly. That page basically is a sales pitch put together by probably a completely separate marketing team.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
327 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

58940 readers
5603 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS