663
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/news@lemmy.world

More than 100 Arizona Palestinian, Arab, Muslim, and progressive Democrats and community leaders have signed a letter making the case for those reluctant to support Kamala Harris against Donald Trump.

“We know that many in our communities are resistant to vote for Kamala Harris because of the Biden administration’s complicity in the genocide,” the letter, published Thursday night, reads.

“Some of us have lost many family members in Gaza and Lebanon. We respect those who feel they simply can’t vote for a member of the administration that sent the bombs that may have killed their loved ones,” the letter continued. “As we consider the full situation carefully, however, we conclude that voting for Kamala Harris is the best option for the Palestinian cause and all of our communities.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 17 points 1 hour ago

Try explaining this to .ml

[-] Emmie@lemm.ee 8 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

Comment removed.
Reason: Rule 1 (western propaganda)

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Good, I hope it does some good. Any other vote is a vote for Trump, intended or not, and Trump won't just ignore the genocide. His track record makes it abundantly clear that he'll absolutely make it worse.

[-] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago

If I were an American, I'd probably vote Harris if and only if I live in a swing state or a state where the margins between votes aren't too high. In any state where the outcome seems set in stone, I'd vote a third party candidate (probably Jill Stein). They won't get elected, but if there's a noticeable increase in the number of votes for them, it might make democrats nervous that their political orientation choices aren't viable. I'd also start campaigning for the third party the day after the election, regardless of the outcome.

[-] TBi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That’s exactly what all the people who didn’t bother voting in the Brexit referendum thought. “The outcome is set in stone, no need to vote”.

Don’t waste your vote!

[-] derf82@lemmy.world 91 points 10 hours ago

Do Muslim’s really think voting for Muslim ban guy who would give Israel even more weapons a better choice?

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 31 points 4 hours ago

No but Russian troll farm employees sure want us to believe it.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Oh good, this must be a safe community. Asklemmy@lemmy.ml banned me for having the audacity to suggest the russian trolls might be fewer in number than the number of their accounts would suggest.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

Yeah, their admin is working for russia.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Many are extremely conservative, and just want a tax cut.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

The tax cut that Turnip would only give to the 1%?

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Lot are well off, and the rest think they'll get it anyway.

Remember, the Trump tax cuts were popular-ish even when most people got like $100/yr.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 26 points 9 hours ago

Many just want to stay home, but in contested districts their absence may mean something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 102 points 11 hours ago

That is fucking brutal.

I agree but man what a horrible choice.

[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Every election in the US is that way. It's a choice of the lesser evil and you can only vote against the greater evil not vote for good.

[-] Shark_Ra_Thanos@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

IA! Fthagn!

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 29 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

yeah its a truly dystopian choice but voting for somebody doesn't mean you approve of everything they have done or will do.

It just means for those with affected friends and families they have done the cruel calculus and have decided which path will be lesser of two evils.

I fully expect trump to try to deport palestinian refugees and its crazy this is where we are at.

[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

I mean, he's promised to deport Americans who protest on behalf of the Palestinians. He sure wouldn't hesitate to deport Palestinian refugees.

[-] Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 6 hours ago

It is no choice between someone who disappoints me in their responses on this issue, and someone who openly wonders if sending a nuclear warhead into a hurricane a couple hundred miles offshore will lead to a positive result. And of course that was with where his mental state was at over 4 years ago.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago

Well said!!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
663 points (96.9% liked)

News

23232 readers
3928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS