283
No shit, we've all BEEN here the whole time, we've watched this unfold
don’t underestimate the frog in hot water effect. it can make it hard for some people to notice the dramatic increase if they aren’t paying close attention. it helps fascists gain power
smells like desperation. if he doesnt win, hes got quite a few court appearances to answer to.
I still don't get how we ignored our own constitution and allowed insurectionist to have a second chance.
WTF America?
Bc pwn libs.
And it'll happen again if given a quarter of a chance. Get voting!
Merrick Garland’s fecklessness will go in the history books—that is if they are not all burned by the MAGA Nazis
Milquetoast.
His name is Milquetoast.
Neville Garland.
Because presidents are kings now thanks to the supreme court.
If our king displayed behavior anywhere close to how Trump behaves, it would've been the end of monarchy in Norway, and indeed any other modern monarchy.
I've got loads of respect for anyone willing to sift through 9 years of Trump speeches without turning insane.
Id feel sorry for anyone who did this manually when it is a relatively simple sentiment analysis project the can be done programmatically. The hardest part would be sourcing the transcripts or audio files (which then could be transcribed programmatically)
They probably forced some poor, innocent algorithm to do it
Maybe this is how Skynet happened
And it would be justified
Added to the pile of everything else we're shoveling it. I prefer Ultron's take on things seconds after its birth.
The share of words associated with violence rose from almost 0.6% in 2016 to 1.6% in 2024 in Trump’s speeches. As a comparison, the proportion of violent words in 40 randomly chosen weekly radio addresses by Barack Obama was 0.79%
Obama more violent than 2016 Trump confirmed. /s
The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Conversation:
Wiki: reliable - The Conversation publishes articles from academics who are subject-matter experts. It is generally reliable for subjects in the authors' areas of expertise. Opinions published in The Conversation should be handled with WP:RSOPINION.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://theconversation.com/we-analyzed-9-years-of-trump-political-speeches-and-his-violent-rhetoric-has-increased-dramatically-238962
this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
283 points (97.6% liked)
politics
19107 readers
3224 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS