111
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] not_again@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

GOP: we've investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong.

Nothing if not predictable.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

They found plenty wrong. Then ignored it.

[-] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Cop didn't see it: I didn't do it", but at a government level. Wild.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the furthest they could go. A conga line of witnesses didn't mean jack. Granted nothing is enough when there's zero intention to be objective from the onset.

Not to mention the cowards who did the right thing and voted to proceed with impeachment cowed before the outrage of the idiots in the far-right minority that all the GQP insist on catering to and ignored the actual trial.

It's too bad Republicans don't ignore their fascist shitbags like the Democratic party ignores progressives.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“The weaponization of the impeachment process to settle political differences is not only wrong, it is immoral and corrupt,” he said in a statement. “Now that this shameful process is over, my work to defend our constitutional rights will resume.”

… except when my team does it.

Edit: removed /s as it came off changing the meaning of my comment.

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seriously as his team is seeking to impeach Biden over...checks notes...nothing? The GQP has been investigating Biden and have literally found zero evidence of wrongdoing.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

He was reported by his own aides. And some Republicans still voted against him. It wasn't weaponized. He's saying that to try and downplay that there's still a federal investigation into it and that all this means is that he won't be impeached. It doesn't mean he can't be charged and convicted criminally which will have a real jury that isn't just his own party protecting him.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


DALLAS (AP) — For years, the powers and protections that come with being Texas’ top lawyer have helped Ken Paxton fend off ethics complains, criminal charges and an FBI investigation.

After being cleared, Paxton, 60, thanked his lawyers for “exposing the absurdity” of the “false allegations” against him, and he promised to resume doing legal battle with the administration of President Joe Biden.

Back in office, Paxton nonetheless still faces serious risk on three fronts: an ongoing a federal investigation into the same allegations that led to his impeachment; a disciplinary proceeding over his effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election; and felony securities fraud charges dating to 2015.

THE FEDERAL INVESTIGAITON Paxton came under FBI investigation in 2020 when eight of his top deputies reported him for allegedly breaking the law to help a wealthy donor, Austin real estate developer Nate Paul.

Paxton’s trial has been delayed by legal debate over whether it should be heard in the Dallas area or Houston, changes in which judge would handle it and a protracted battle over how much the special prosecutors should get paid.

In 2020, Paxton asked the U.S. Supreme Court to, effectively, overturn then-President Donald Trump’s electoral defeat by Joe Biden based on bogus claims of fraud.


The original article contains 947 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
111 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1468 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS