139
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/technology@beehaw.org
(page 2) 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Lawyers goings to have lots of gigs these days

[-] chahk@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

If they first don't get fired for using ChatGPT and not double-checking the results.

[-] fulano@lemmy.eco.br 0 points 2 years ago

Are you saying that, technically, chatgpt is constructing legal cases against itself?

[-] chahk@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

No, I'm saying this already actually happened. Some lawyer or paralegal used ChatGPT for a court case, and it referenced non-existent cases.

[-] while1malloc0@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

They got off surprisingly easy for doing so, too: https://www.reuters.com/legal/new-york-lawyers-sanctioned-using-fake-chatgpt-cases-legal-brief-2023-06-22/. The $5k they were fined amounts to roughly 14 billable hours if they’re at the NY average of $357 an hour https://www.attorneyatwork.com/solo-and-small-firm-lawyer-hourly-rates/#h-the-top-10-states-for-lawyer-hourly-rates.

[-] moosetruce@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

I tested by asking ChatGPT 3.5 specific questions about The Bedwetter, and it seems like it was not trained on the full text of the book. I asked it what is the first sentence, and then what is the second paragraph, and it gave plausible but incorrect answers. I asked it for the table of contents, and then if a specific chapter was in the book, and it said "my responses are generated based on pre-existing data and do not have real-time access to specific book content". I asked who wrote the foreward, and who wrote the afterward. It said Patton Oswalt wrote the foreward and that there is no afterward. In reality, Sarah wrote the foreward and God wrote the afterward.

ChatGPT conversation
Table of contents and first chapter from Google Books.

[-] technojamin@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

LLMs compress data, there’s no way ChatGPT could remember every detail of the book alongside all the other information it stores in its encodings. The issue isn’t whether the entire text of the book is contained within the encodings, it’s whether it was trained on the book in the first place.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
139 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38047 readers
218 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS