34
Report finds ‘shocking and dispiriting’ fall in children reading for pleasure (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 hours ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/literature@beehaw.org
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Children's reading enjoyment has fallen to its lowest level in almost two decades, with just one in three young people saying that they enjoy reading in their free time, according to a new survey.

Only 34.6% of eight- to 18-year-olds surveyed by the National Literacy Trust (NLT) said that they enjoy reading in their spare time. This is the lowest level recorded by the charity since it began surveying children about their reading habits 19 years ago, representing an 8.8 percentage point drop since last year.

It is also part of a broader downward trend since 2016, when almost two in three children said that they enjoyed reading.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sweetpotato@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago

So you mean to tell me that when corporations, bigger, richer and more influential than entire governments and countries, are left unregulated to manufacture and advertise products designed by psychologists and behavioural scientists to capture as much of our attention as possible, our attentions are captured and we can't spend time on beneficial hobbies? That's really unexpected..

[-] MrBadApple@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 9 hours ago

Perhaps if children in many US schools were not forced to read to a pre set quota they night enjoy it. Being mandated to do something you may not already enjoy rarely results in future enjoyment of that activity.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 10 points 8 hours ago

Also having teachers that understand the value of literature besides traditional early American/European authors. Those authors are boring (for me) for the most part. If your school district forces that particular genre, let the kids read Frankenstein or other early sci-fi and horror. For the love of all that is enjoyable, don't force Hawthorne on anyone. Especially when they are, as a purely hypothetical, falling asleep while reading the book in class.

[-] ErsatzCoalButter@beehaw.org 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

lmao, the article is about the UK

if you would like to criticize American education anyway, perhaps we could find a nice article about that subject together

*edit: here you are

**edit 2, i still don't want to talk about your teacher @Vodulas@beehaw.org 😜

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 1 points 4 hours ago

i still don’t want to talk about your teacher @Vodulas@beehaw.org 😜

That's fair. I will say, it is also true in the US, and seems to be going down faster here. This is from 2021, but still

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/12/among-many-u-s-children-reading-for-fun-has-become-less-common-federal-data-shows/

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago

I think you are mistaking criticism for district mandated curricula for criticism of teachers. If anything, my comment was more critical of teachers, but also that was about teachers when I was in high school

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I'm always interested to see exactly what is included and excluded from their definition of reading. On average, most adults actually read more today that we did in the 90s, if you're purely talking words of text consumed. Are graphic novels being included in these stats? Short stories? Social media threads? Most people even watch videos/tv/movies with subtitles they read now, which was not something that was an option before.

The actual article text never says the word "book" once, but I strongly suspect that is all that's being counted.

[-] iagomago@feddit.it 4 points 5 hours ago

As a teacher in lower secondary school, kids don't do any of that. They read physical media sporadically, and the main kind of digital media they consume is through IG and TikTok, furtherly filtered by the algorithm to appeal to their interest. The only kind of excitement I see in their eyes when talking reading is when talking manga, but even then it's mostly because they got there through anime (dubbed, so not even with subs) first. Kids don't read half as often as we did twenty years ago, and teachers get the blame for trying to push some sense in them through lecture.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 1 points 4 hours ago

The only kind of excitement I see in their eyes when talking reading is when talking manga

I don't think you meant that manga is bad, but there is a huge variety of manga, and a lot of it is really good. But even if they just read shonen, is that a problem? They are reading for fun. It should be celebrated

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

IG and TikTok videos often have captions to read so they can be watched without sound, so they're not inherently a counter to my point. But yes, it's just another "boob tube". It's not good, but it's certainly not any worse than watching tv nonstop, which is where we were in the 90s and aughts. And kids are on Discord and in text chains constantly, whereas during the pre-internet 20th century, most people called people to communicate long-distance; letters were certainly not a daily thing.

We're about 70 years too late to stop visual media supplanting text as the main form of entertainment media, but at least the internet has brought text back in lots of ways that just didn't exist previously (especially forums and messaging).

I remember when Harry Potter and Twilight both made headlines for both getting adults "reading again" (because they already were mostly not), but then also a bunch of people jumping in and deriding them as trash, insisting that they need to read 'real' books, and there's a bouquet of that in a lot of the discussion of social media.

If we take away IG and TikTok and smartphones, kids aren't going to go read, they're just going to watch TV.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 6 hours ago

The kinds of works that create an educated adult instead of a consumer.

[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Given that there are plenty of pro-consumerism schlocky books (if not the majority, being that most are just entertainment-targeted consumer goods), and plenty of highly educational non-book texts, this doesn't really mean anything.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 6 hours ago

So there can't be educational graphic novels, short stories, TV, movies? Hell there is even educational content to be found on social media if you look

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

So all of the above?

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

Literature

5411 readers
49 users here now

Pretty straightforward: books and literature of all stripes can be discussed here.

If you're interested in posting your own writing, formal or informal, check out the Writing community!

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Kamirose@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org