25
submitted 6 days ago by nikaaa@lemmy.world to c/space@lemmy.world

If you mine something, you can't mine it again. It's gone from the ground.

If you harvest something, then wait a certain amount of time (a year, for example), you can harvest it again.

Is Water on Mars a renewable resource?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago

Harvesting does not imply a resource is renewable. Most crops are annuals, and we eat the parts needed for reproduction, or harvest them before maturity.

That said, I'm not sure if "renewable" is the right word. On Earth, the water cycle purifies water through evaporation and ground filtering, but not quickly enough for human use, so we process our wastewater and distill our drinking water. On Mars, the environment is not suitable for a water cycle (too cold, not enough water, atmospheric losses), so any captured water should be processed and reused without release.

Your terminology is wrong, you should probably change your question to β€œis water on mars a renewable resource?”

[-] _bcron_@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

To way oversimplify: it's finite so you'd eventually have no water to pull out of Mars. However, once you have it and use it, you can try to capture and filter and reuse, and you'd be able to get many gallons of use out of a single cup (not all at once, just cumulatively). But if it somehow escapes, it's gonna get smacked by solar winds and you won't be able to recover those molecules, so you'd want to figure out a good setup to contain whatever water you found. It's that lack of atmosphere that'd cause all the issues, once it leaves your setup it's gone

[-] Thorry84@feddit.nl 2 points 5 days ago

No, Mars lost 99.999% of all of it's water. The part that remained is stored frozen inside. As soon as you take it out, it will be gone forever.

You can try and use and recycle it as much as you can, but once you lose it, it's lost.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Which shouldn't be that much of a problem, because everyone is going to be sealed in a closed environment anyway. There will be losses, but it's not like we'd be venting water vapor into the atmosphere.

If we can terraform enough to sustain an atmosphere to hold water vapor, we'd probably also be able to produce enough liquid water somehow, since they're both in the same region of science fiction right now. Maybe there's enough hydrogen and oxygen in the geology somewhere. If not, maybe we could produce them from nuclear reactions. But that would be very energy-consuming, so like I said, science fiction.

[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 points 5 days ago

You would have better luck hitting Mars with comets and meteors. The meteors to bulk up mass and (maybe) restart the core and the comets to add water.

[-] nikaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I'd guess that's not practical approach.

[-] ByteMe@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

I’m not sure how it would be harvested but I guess both would be possible

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
25 points (90.3% liked)

Space

8669 readers
33 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS