215
submitted 1 week ago by todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] joker125@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

Goddammit we were all warned about this MULTIPLE fucking times.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"I'll be a dictator on day one."

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

They appear to be flying the Ferengi flag, sir.

[-] hohoho@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Looks like a bunch of KKK hoods to me

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Is that supposed to say Donald Trump..? Serious question because it definitely doesn’t say that at all no matter how bad your writing is..

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago

I think it says DonaldJHamberders

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I can see it, coming from being around boomer executive types. It’s a testosterone piss mark like the crushing handshake.

And not to be a downer, but I was taught that way too. Not the aggressive ink and strokes from Trump (lol, mic drop), but the obfuscation. Back when cheques were big anyway.

I was actually taught first, getting my first account as a kid, that you could sign as Superman or X as long as you just kept doing it. Kinda shaped me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Meh, most of it will be challenged in court.

That's one of the first things I noticed with his previous try; For all of Obamas flaws, it at least seemed that everything was thought through with lawyers in the loop to make sure the execitive orders had a reasonable chance of surviving a legal challenge.

And then this clown comes along and gives the impression that he handed someone a post-it that said "no moar muzleems!!!111one"

[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 114 points 1 week ago

That's why he's been stacking the courts for the last eight years.

[-] humble_pete_digger@lemm.ee 42 points 1 week ago

How about this new thing that came out today - he's establishing the board to purge generals.

Is he readying complete takeover?

[-] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

Of course. He’s already said he only needs to be a dictator on Day One. And the if you vote for him, “You’ll never have to vote again.”

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

AND HERE WE ARE BECAUSE AMERICA IS RETARDED

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Well that's terrifying. He knows the military won't back him in a coup... As is.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Considering how much time it took Obamas orders to even get to the Supreme Court, it can be as biased as he wants it: There's no way they'll get through all of it in a timely manner. Plus, there are still state courts.

[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

Ooh I hope to retain your optimism in the next few years…

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago

Oh sure the courts will sure stop him guys! He won't totally just, do whatever the fuck he wants

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

yeah, they'll put him in jail, you'll see! With all the things he did that won't be long! Very soon! Right?

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are already putting him in jail for all the other crimes he's committed... Shouldn't be too hard to give him more time!

[-] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Challenged in court? The bloody dude was announced above the law BY THE SUPREME COURT. As long as he OFFICIALLY kills all opposition, he's got a full green light on everything. The only thing stopping him will be military officers refusing orders that are too fucking outlandish. Tho I doubt the police will care too much.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Immunizing Trump as an individual from prosecution related to acts performed as President, while deeply problematic, will not prevent legal challengs his EO's. Striking down a president's EO is completely different than convicting a president with a crime.

[-] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't really see the difference, considering he can just lock anybody who opposes him up. People are already bending over for him out of fear, people that used to be critical of him. Challenging him will take some serious balls facing a suicide mission.

[-] 4grams@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

how is it that everyone seems to have forgotten about this: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

trump owns the judicial branch and they put him above the law.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That's the thing about the massive lumbering behemoth that is "government".

Despite anyone's best efforts, actually changing shit is a slow, arduous, sometimes impossible process.

Not saying he won't try, but he'll be about as successful as making America fit his vision as Biden, Obama, Bushel, Clinton, .... Etc were.

The other good news, is that historically, 100% of the time (except for NK), When the strong man dies, the party dies with it.

My optimistic prediction is that Trump keeps all of our blood pressure high for 4 years, and then we witness the actual death of the GOP, and that in average, most things will stay more or less the same.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

I'm going to let myself believe this but for the same reason I might have weed.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 23 points 1 week ago

I read that as “flurry of executions”, and though “sounds plausible”

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Because he already did that.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Leaving the World Health Organization is terrifying

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
215 points (96.9% liked)

News

23376 readers
1637 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS