5

Yeah, both sides amiright?

(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Hey OP can you list the restrictions currently in place?

[-] donuts@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

They are mentioned in the article, if we can call it that. But no specifics:

Currently, U.S. restrictions include an embargo on a certain weapons shipment and limitations on various combat-related equipment, even if they do not involve explosive ordnance.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What does this entail, nukes?

The 2000 pound bombs are still flowing. I can't think of a single restriction.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

The problem is not military restrictions. Biden did not have any either. The problem is recognition of annexed territories. We see how Israel is clearing out the northern part of Gaza and they are already talking about annexing the West Bank. We are likely to see a lot more violence in the West Bank soon. My guess is parts of Jerusalem and Jericho being in focus.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

The problem is recognition of annexed territories.

Don't look too hard at Harris's pick for VP if this is the pretext for "we're not as bad" that you're clinging to

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

Yeah didn't he call for the creation of "greater israel" in the region or something?

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] neanderthal@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Well, to all the folks arguing with me on how voting for Harris was bad because of Gaza: CONGRATULATIONS! You REALLY made a point there. The Palestinians had a chance under Harris. Instead of voting for a chance for the Palestinians, you did nothing or voted for genocide. You did it from the other side of the world, where you won't have to suffer the consequences.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

The Palestinians had a chance under Harris.

based on what data? You're just making stuff up.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

based on them trying to feel better about voting for genocide and losing. they got the worst of both worlds instead of doing the right thing and gathering support for a better party

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The mighty democratic party ladies and gents, blaming their epic across-the-entire government, across every demographic loss on a tiny minority of voters they explicitely said they'd bomb ---instead of owning the fact that they are out of touch with all of their voters who arent rich people.

[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Did anyone tell the Palestinians that this would have been the same and to not worry? We had brave, brave people who sat on their hands and did nothing in their name, so I hope they're grateful for their "sacrifice."

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago

You could literally ask them yourself. They quite explicitly refused to vote for you and your genocidal racist candidate.

You brave, brave keyboard warrior who would get their ass beat if you said any of this in person

[-] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Let's be real. The Zionists in charge are Nazis and there was never a path out of genocide in these elections.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

Such a fucking idiotic take... I'm sure Palestinians will take heart in this sentiment when they get gassed out of existence on January 21.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Democrats: Vote for us, we care about human rights and will manage out genocide more humanely.

Democrats: Haha! You didn't vote for us and now the genocide we started will get worse.

Really shows how much the Democrats care about human rights and genocide. I really regret not voting for them now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Where my “Democrats are evil genocide people” posters now?

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Russians don't need to make them anymore.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago

the blue maga can’t see anything with their tongue so up dnc cronies.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
5 points (85.7% liked)

politics

19308 readers
1317 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS