Matt Gaetz Is the Best Possible Outcome for Attorney General (www.thenation.com)

submitted 18 hours ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The column actually backs up the hed, as abhorrent as it is at first, second and third glances.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 6 points 5 hours ago

ive heard some people theorizing his nomination is also a distraction from Tulsi Gabbards nomination . Gaetz is monopolizing most of the conversation around the nominations when he has a shaky chance at being confirmed at all. Gabbard is way more likely to cause serious damage to national security.

[-] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 26 points 18 hours ago

I expected to be offended and/or astonished by a ridiculously transparent bit of sanewashing here, but you know... I think I actually might agree.

It does seem to be a valid point - Gaetz is a grotesquely destructive demagogue and Trump sycophant, but he's also a buffoon, and that's undoubtedly better than a grotesquely destructive demagogue and Trump sycophant who's also a smart and devious and highly skilled politician.

Huh...

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 6 hours ago

It's a bit like the logic of why Trump may be better than De'Satan, he's a reckless destructive arse, but at least he's stupid too.

Problem is though now they have a pile of people behind that 2025 doc to make up for their own lack of knowledge...

[-] zhunk@beehaw.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Project 2025 from the Heritage Foundation and the America First Transition Project from the America First Policy Institute. Same shit, different toilet, even more organized freaks.

[-] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 9 hours ago

I mean, it also forced him to resign from Congress and he's also unlikely to survive the confirmation process, especially if the ethics report is released...

Either way, that's a good outcome I suppose.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 28 points 17 hours ago

This logic is going to keep getting trotted out throughout the trump presidency. In some cases it'll be true. In this case I think it could be. In many cases it won't be , simply because destroying things is easier than building things and they're mostly there to destroy .

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024

16 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10179 readers

97 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org