47

I think this would be a step in the right direction.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Steve@communick.news 7 points 5 days ago

They also suggest splitting off Android and sharing data. But that seems barely a start. If you're going through the effort to take them down, take them all the way down.

They should split off nearly every major product and service. Make it a couple dozen separate companies.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago

Chrome or Chromium? Because it's logically impossible to have Chrome without Google.

[-] millie@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago

I would be stunned if the DoJ knows the difference between Chrome and Chromium.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 days ago

Could you expand on that? Why couldn't Chrome exist like Firefox does?

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago

I guess you could keep Chrome as it is running in another company... But Chrome is Google-service-clogged Chromium, still making money for Google and changing literally nothing in terms of monopolistic behavior by Google. I don't see the benefit in this division.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 days ago

I'd imagine if Chrome was split, all the integrations would either have to be opened to other companies, imagine "log in to Chrome with your Microsoft account", or would have to go away.

At least Google wouldn't be able to treat web standards as their own playground any more, so other browsers could compete better.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

Or... "Chrome company" could strike a deal with Google and keep an exclusive integration with Chrome, in exchange of all of users metadata. Capitalis*m.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

I don't doubt something shitty is going to happen, but that would still be better, since Google would have to pay for fucking up the internet instead of doing it for free like now. And on the other hand, wouldn't Google have to pay more than its competition combined for exclusivity?

Imagine Google pays Chrome 1 million schmeckles for exclusivity, if Microsoft and Amazon would show up saying they would also pay 1-1 million just for access, then Google would realistically need to pay at least 2 million for it to still make sense for Chrome. Something that used to be free for Google now is something that they need to outbid their whole competition for.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
205 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS