55
submitted 1 day ago by hazz223@mstdn.social to c/firefox@fedia.io

Slightly buried in the news that #Chrome will have to be sold off, there's also news that Google cannot pay browsers to be their default search engine.
That's going to have huge effects, especially for browsers like #Firefox - it's going to be an interesting to see this pan out

#tech #webdev #google #programming #web #code #Mozilla

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] superkret@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago

So a lawsuit against Google will end up killing Firefox?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago

And Chrome too. I don't really see how either of those can be viable without that search engine money.

[-] hazz223@mstdn.social 8 points 1 day ago

@superkret weirdly, yeah. Firefox gets the majority of its money from Google paying to be the default browser. If they're banned from doing that, a lot of browsers will see a big drop in funding.

[-] markstos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If happens, it will start a clock ticking for Firefox to replace that income or shrink to a sustainable staff size before their money runs out.

Would Apple be banned from funding Firefox by this?

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 12 points 1 day ago

Note that it's not "will have to be" sold off, it's that the demand is for that to happen. The case still has to play out (including appeals) before we know what the actual consequences will be.

[-] jlow@beehaw.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is going to be very interesting. Not getting that sweet Google money anymore will Mozilla a) finally concentrate on making a good browser or b) enshittify all the things! I really wonder if it would possible for the community to maintain a fork when Mozilla implodes. It seems to be working for Thunderbird but E-Mail is probably a lot less complicated than keeping up with a gazillion webstandards pushed by thousands of Chrome engineers.

[-] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

@jlow@beehaw.org

@hazz223@mstdn.social Hopefully Chrome can't do much better. Also hopefully Apple continues to make Safari good, but rejects adding more standards in general (a few might be good, but not too many)

[-] hazz223@mstdn.social 2 points 1 day ago

@jlow if the Google funding dropped out, I really don't know how tenable it would be to keep the Gecko engine working / with pace with Chromium etc.

Ironic that this is to help competition, when really it'll probably end it.

[-] jlow@beehaw.org 2 points 8 hours ago

That would be just awful, I cant really believe that is going to happen. I'd think it end up maybe be a browser for "just" browsing websites and you'd need a Chrom(ium) based one (or - like back the day! - specialised programs!) for fancy stuff like videocalling, DRM video playback, docs, chat and whatever else you do in the browser nowadays. Which would be awful as well but ...

[-] zoostation@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

What about operating systems? Apple sells out their users to Google in the same way for billions of dollars a year.

[-] hazz223@mstdn.social 3 points 1 day ago

@zoostation good question. Though in Apples case, they're probably fine. They make a tonne of cash, and have a pile of it 😅

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

4 readers
19 users here now

The latest news and developments on Firefox and Mozilla, a global non-profit that strives to promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the web.

You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Related

Rules

While we are not an official Mozilla community, we have adopted the Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines as far as it can be applied to a bin.

Rules

  1. Always be civil and respectful
    Don't be toxic, hostile, or a troll, especially towards Mozilla employees. This includes gratuitous use of profanity.

  2. Don't be a bigot
    No form of bigotry will be tolerated.

  3. Don't post security compromising suggestions
    If you do, include an obvious and clear warning.

  4. Don't post conspiracy theories
    Especially ones about nefarious intentions or funding. If you're concerned: Ask. Please don’t fuel conspiracy thinking here. Don’t try to spread FUD, especially against reliable privacy-enhancing software. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Show credible sources.

  5. Don't accuse others of shilling
    Send honest concerns to the moderators and/or admins, and we will investigate.

  6. Do not remove your help posts after they receive replies
    Half the point of asking questions in a public sub is so that everyone can benefit from the answers—which is impossible if you go deleting everything behind yourself once you've gotten yours.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS