208
submitted 1 year ago by mondoman712@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

It's nice to see larger outlets talking about urbanism topics and Vox has made a few videos in this area recently.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ntzm@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago

Erm how am I meant to take my grandma to hospital and also drop off three fridges and my kids to school and then an entire building's worth of bricks? Therefore cargo bikes will never work in any situation. I am very smart.

[-] puppy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You forgot to mention that you do this each day every day. Not a once a year or once a quarter thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buzziebee@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

For those of you getting riled up to point out how this wouldn't work in rural Nebraska - yeah no shit!

This video is taking about how it can be very beneficial for urban areas to use electric cargo bikes rather than vans, and how it helps everyone to remove the amount of vehicles in inner cities by providing safer ways for bikes to move around (and better for emissions too!). The parcel services in my city all have hubs where lorry's drop off pallets, and then bike porters to take the parcels for the final mile. It works great.

Everytime there's a video about the benefits of bike infrastructure or public transport the online discourse gets filled with pointless bad faith drivel about how public transport or bike lanes don't work in an area with a population density of 0.000001/km^2. No one is claiming that's the case, and no one benefits from you pointing that out. Get a grip.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mrpants@midwest.social 33 points 1 year ago

I haven't read the article and am here to give my ignorant opinion. This wouldn't work ever anywhere for any reason. Thank you.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's not even an article, it's a fucking video.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Having been a driver for Amazon in the past for around a year and a half, I’ll tell you right now that these bikes wouldn’t work in a lot of places Amazon delivers. In dense urban areas? Sure, but certainly not out in the ‘burbs or rural areas.

Package counts on those routes can top out around 500. There’s no way Amazon would purposely reduce the amount of work they lay onto one driver.

Now that being said, if they loosened their iron grip over the drivers then I can absolutely see this happening in downtowns and some apartment complexes. Outside of really densely packed areas, it doesn’t make a lot of sense.

Some routes have drivers going well over 100 miles in a day. No way anyone’s gonna do that on a bike. And in the middle of summer in southern cities? Forget about it. Amazon doesn’t even give drivers enough time to find a bathroom, no way they’ll allow drivers to take breaks to cool off.

[-] CurtAdams@urbanists.social 40 points 1 year ago

@SuiXi3D @mondoman712 From the OP: "It's time to replace *URBAN* delivery vans."

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peanuts4life@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

Instinctually, I don't like this idea. I'm all for eliminating cars and roads, but delivery drivers are already vulnerable and exploited enough. I can't imagine delivering packages for Amazon in the searing heat here in Florida while every car tried to run you off the road.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

I was in Paris a couple weeks ago and literally everyone delivering things were on cargo e-bikes or e-trikes. Bikes and cars coexisted on roads but there was also a lot of dedicated bike and pedestrian roads too.

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Paris isn't Florida, that's fersher!

[-] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

There's a lot of places in the world that aren't florida

[-] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Yes would need better bike infrastructure before this is reasonable.

[-] johnthedoe@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I think cars should be prioritised for commercial use. It serves more people like a bus or train does to public transport. In fact a van with more parcels would eliminate more trips from individual homes to the post office by car. That said. Cars shouldn’t be the only option for delivery for sure. Depending on the city and delivery region.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

These vans are a hell of a lot better than semis, which IMO should not be allowed in cities. I'd be fine with more of these vans being around if it meant we could get rid of large 18 wheelers in urban areas.

[-] Freeman@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Why is noone mentioning that this video was sponsored by Delta Airlines?

I am not saying that the content isnt good but it is somehow strange to me that an Airline of all companies is sponsoring such a video

[-] valpackett@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Air travel is quite polluting, of course I would expect such companies to have a PR budget focused on that kind of thing..

[-] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Outside of dense urban core there just isn't enough packages per mile to make this even slightly sane. Outside of temperate areas this would be awful when the weather is very cold or very hot. In all areas you would have to secure the packages against trivial theft and rain further adding to the weight and decreasing maximum cargo area.

Even in the fraction of places where this would be practicable differences in speed and cargo capacity means you would need more drivers to achieve the same results. It makes 100x more sense to to push ebikes as an alternative to commuters.

[-] Starb3an@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

I would absolutely use one of these and my bike (except when the temp is over 100°F/38°C) if the infrastructure was there. My previous apartment was on a road with a bike lane that led to a bike path near my work so I used to take that when weather permitted.

[-] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First let me start by saying fuck cars, i dont like the fact that the world infrastructure is centered around them when trains (be it coal or electric) and rails exist. And now on to the rage baith:

I dont like that this pretty much shifts the reaponsibility from big corporations polution onto its workers, if delivery people had a union this would be an absolute no no, because its asking way more phisical push with what is going to be the same amount of packages with the same low pay with way more effort from the part of the worker, when we know that the polluting monsters are the companies they work for and the tech the companies employ and refuses to change into more sustainable ones, like planes, factories in some cases and the waste they produce and irresponsibly dump, be it abroad with uncaring legislations or locally. While i too would like a total redesign of urban infrastructure to suportt more sustainable transportation technologies, whe are gonna have to do with what we have (at least for the moment) and a better answer for that specifically imo would be fully electric vehicles, and in keeping with the taking less space theme, electric cargo motorbikes (the ones that dont have pedals). The same as the ones like the pizza delivery ones but with rechargable batteries instead of a gas engine.

Oh btw downvotes to the right.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my city this wouldn't work, the millisecond the delivery guy turns away his head, assholes would have stolen all the deliveries. It could be used only from point to point, not fully loaded with hundreds of small deliveries

An armored crate would increase the weight too much for human propulsion

[-] kim_harding@mastodon.scot 8 points 1 year ago

@Moonrise2473 @mondoman712 you can have locked boxes on cargo bikes... It ain't rocket science

[-] Jelly_mcPB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Isn't this a big step backwards?

[-] Green_Bay_Guy@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

Idk. We have moped delivery here in Vietnam, and I w incredibly fast and efficient. Packages are even moved daily in transit buses that connect cities.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not watching some dumb video to know how dumb inefficient and ineffective this is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
208 points (84.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9817 readers
46 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS