220
submitted 2 years ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Jonathan Guessford was first confronted, then hassled, then pursued, then pulled over, and, finally, cited for a moving violation he didn’t commit by Delaware state troopers.

Guessford managed to attract the attention of Corporal Stephen Douglas, Trooper Nicholas Gallo, and Master Corporal Raiford Box by calling attention to a state police speed trap. As is detailed in Guessford’s lawsuit [PDF] (and captured on multiple cameras, including Guessford’s phone), the officers rolled up on Guessford armed with their attitudes and some convenient lies.

This is from the NBC report on the recent lawsuit settlement:

The cell phone video shows troopers approaching Guessford, who was standing in a grassy area next to the shoulder of Route 13 north of Dover. Douglas told Guessford that he was “disrupting traffic,” while Gallo, based on a witness report, said Guessford was “jumping into traffic.”

“You are a liar,” Guessford told Gallo.

“I’m on the side of the road, legally parked, with a sign which is protected by the First Amendment,” he told troopers.

Dascham video shows Douglas twice lunging at Guessford to prevent him from raising his sign. Gallo then ripped it from his hands and tore it up.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Weslee@lemmy.world 94 points 2 years ago

Wrong title, should say Delaware tax payers pay to enable police to continue to be power mad control freaks

[-] dethb0y@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

That would be a more accurate title.

[-] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It amazes me how little some police officers know about the law and the limits of their authority. Its literally the one thing a cop should be informed about.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Supreme Court ruled that's not their job. They're not required to know every law, and they're allowed to get away with false arrests as long as they think what they're arresting someone for is the law. (They also ruled in a separate case that police are not required to render aid to citizens, they're legally able to watch someone murder you and do nothing to stop it.)

On the flip side, the Supreme Court also ruled that it's every citizens responsibility to be intimately familiar with every law because "not knowing the law" isn't a reasonable defense.

Funny how that works, doncha think?

[-] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago

AND they ruled police have no obligation to protect you. Very Funny.

[-] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Don't forget the part where they can come up with probable cause for the arrest after the fact.

[-] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago

And the part where they get to be counseled for weeks before investigations

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 16 points 2 years ago

They very well know the law. They just don’t care, because they know the taxpayers will pay out on the lawsuits, while they, the cops, continue to get away breaking the law without any form of punishment.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

As they say, you can beat the charges but you can’t beat the ride. Maybe that’d change if these dickheads were on the hook for that 50 grand instead of Delaware taxpayers.

[-] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago

Thats why any settlement money should be taken from the police pension fund.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Alternatively, require police to personally carry malpractice insurance that pays for these kinds of settlements. When their rates start skyrocketing or their entire precincts rates double because a couple of them couldn't control their temper you'd better believe shit would change.

Become such a liability that you can't find anyone willing to insure you? Tough shit, guess you shouldn't be a cop.

[-] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Also a very good solution. It all stems from a lack of accountability.

[-] rez_doggie@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

These pigs should be brought up on charges and held personally liable.

Acab, smoke more pork.

The lesson here is to exercise your rights and flip cops off.

You can earn $50,000 doing so.

[-] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 years ago

Or you could get shot. It's really a coin flip at this point.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
220 points (99.5% liked)

News

37850 readers
652 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS