134
submitted 2 weeks ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 56 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t know how people got so duped into thinking musk is a genius, he’s just a spoiled rich kid that got that way by family money and riding the coat takes of others. Even Peter Thiel refers to him as a fraud that believes his own bullshit.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Did you just describe Musk or Trump?

[-] HairyHarry@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago
[-] argon@lemmy.today -4 points 2 weeks ago

There are many, many more spoiled rich kids not nearly as successful as Musk. Musk certainly is exceptionally good at managing businesses. Let's see how good he is at (directly) influencing a government.

[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 35 points 2 weeks ago

Damn, you mean to tell me the lifelong con-man and his team of other con-men and tech oligarchs didn't actually have their audience's best interests in mind, and were just parroting off whatever the right-wing wanted to hear to harvest their votes?

Well I never saw that coming /s

[-] Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

god i want to photoshop musks head like 100x the size back there and it'd be half way to an homage of those 'creepy Garfield'/cosmic horror Garfield memes. "i no longer require the ketamine Donald." "im sorry Donald, i was so hungry." etc etc

[-] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I've seen him somewhere before...

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

His head looks oddly large in this photo

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Trumps going to dump him within six months. If not sooner. Possibly three months at the rate Leons going. Musk seems to be trying a speedrun towards failure.

Historians will debate how many moochies he lasted.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Trump seems to be easily dominated by other strongmen. It’s possible Trump is afraid of Elon Musk and won’t have the confidence to stand up to him, nor the financial means.

[-] masterbaexunn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Trump loooves being dominated

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago
[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Who are those guys hanging with President Musk?

[-] Linedotdatdot@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Business men doing... Business?

[-] credo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Ah MAGA. The group that’s perpetually (1)3-steps behind in reasoning.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

Too charitable.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe if the right wing hadn't spent the last forty years denigrating education and experts then Americans wouldn't worship sports and media stars.

[-] Maiq@lemy.lol 6 points 2 weeks ago

There's a sucker born every minute.

[-] Linedotdatdot@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

'Great Replacement Theory', huh?

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Duped implies they were deceived by Trump's intentions. They weren't duped, they knew exactly what they were getting when they voted that douchebag in.

They just thought it wouldn't impact them.

[-] chryan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It would be delightfully ironic if Musk's right-wing audience he gained from going absolutely batshit insane turned on him as well, further driving away people from his vanity-feeding platform, leaving him destitute and craving for attention he has to lick off the floor.

Can you imagine? A world where we get to talk about Twitter as a thing of the past?

What a dream..

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

the number of people who are super talented engineers AND super motivated in the USA is far too low. Think of this like a pro sports team: if you want your TEAM to win the championship, you need to recruit top talent wherever they may be. That enables the whole TEAM to win.

JFC. First of all, I hate the sports analogies when it comes to corporate bullshit-speak. The only thing that is worse is saying "we are like a family". Secondly, at least in sports, even if the owners make far, far more, at least top talent is compensated to some degree.

The problem the moneyed class has is, and it really, really annoys them, is that they have to compensate top talent that actually do something, not just the executives. And man, the idea of disrupting their corporate caste system annoys them no end.

THIS is why they do all kinds of things to try to break engineers' spirit and trying to keep them from getting too uppity. They collude, and have "gentlemen agreements" to not poach talent from one another. They set salary ranges. The collude with government on programs like H1B. They collude with government to offshore jobs to the lowest cost of living/most desperate countries they can...

God fucking forbid that "top talent" get FUCKING PAID like an executive. That would start puncturing the illusion that the wizards in mahogany row are the real creators of wealth.

[-] Srh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

To bad a good bit of tech engineers see themselves as rugged individuals, who are an eventual executives and are essential to the companies they work for. So they do nothing to help other workers because the they that would be "hurting themselves".

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah, unfortunately, at least since the 80s, a lot of goofy narratives about how Steve Jobs or Bill Gates were "just like you" (meaning the random Galt's Gulch engineer) and with a little pluck and a lot of coding, they made billions. Rinse and repeat this with lots and lots of new characters heading up new companies...

Um, neither of them made that money as engineers...they might have started out doing some related work, but they quickly turned to exploiting other engineers to make the real money.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
134 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19296 readers
1033 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS