There's plenty of countries with cheap insulin, and people there are fine because other treatments for diabetes are cheaper too.
This is horrfying. Shame on the atlantic for publishing that headline.
This was not written by some reach asshole. This was written by someone on the payroll of some rich asshole.
Yes! Without shared ownership over the companies we work at, we have no ownership over how our labor is used. This is why a worker owned economy is such a critical part of Marxism and why Social democracy's attempt to achieve socialist goals through higher taxes and labor rights isn't enough (a golden cage is still a cage.) The heart of socialism is giving people a shared ownership over their labor which means they get a voice and vote on how their labor will be used
we have no ownership over how our labor is used
You can just not work for someone like that
I'd put money on the idea that this guy is a rich asshole and actively causing harm in the field that is his profession. https://www.theatlantic.com/author/michael-rose/
They've also already changed the headline, presumably because that didn't go so well. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/09/diabetes-medication-insulin-cost/671333/
Capitalism fixes everything, duh. Why didn't I realize. I'm so dumb. It's science. Apply capitalism, and bam, nuclear energy.
Bullshit take. Some people ONLY respond to insulin. Fuck whoever wrote this.
Pardon me, but, Mr Rose, can you please tell me.... What fucking better treatments?
My brother is T1D and he's been like that since his teens. Literally the only way for him to continue to live, at all, is to take insulin.
It's times like this that make me thankful I don't live in the USA.
But seriously, if anyone knows of a "better" treatment for type 1 diabetes, I'm all ears. I've been looking for something for my brother for years, and I've come up with jack shit.
Basically they've come up with insulin analogs that are faster acting, ones that are longer lasting, and even ones that "lock" themselves so they can't be absorbed without a high enough presence of glucose
Here's a paper comparing a bunch of them. I'm no expert and it's a deep rabbit hole, but there are a bunch of options, each with their own trade-offs
Have you read the article? It's about how type 2 patients, for whom insulin isn't the best option and who make up the majority of diabetes patients could end up having to use insulin because it's cheaper.
"In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications."
for whom diabetes isn't the best option and who make up the ...
I guess you meant to say "insulin is not the best option"? Because diabetes seems like a shit option all around.
Shhh, now come and sweep yourself under that nice little carpet.
Sounds like a shit title and introduction then.
A lot of type two patients need to manage their diets better. You wouldn't believe the number of people who just keep eating like shit.
Better than having nothing which is the current situation.
I think the point is that insurances might not pay for the better options as willingly as they do now if there's a cheaper option. But I understand too little of the US healthcare system to be completely sure.
The problems aren’t the treatments, the problems are still the assholes pricing the treatments that exacerbate issues with treatment affordability and selection.
I hope these motherfuckers and their apologists die.
Luigi doing it! And now u can do…
Is that Tony Hawk why does that look like Tony Hawk
No lmfao that's Tim Robinson 😂😂😂😂
Hmm, who is this Rose fellow?
Michael Rose is a senior resident in internal medicine and pediatrics at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
The only person The Atlantic could find to peddle this shit isn’t even allowed to practice medicine without supervision? lmao
Not even an endocrine doctor. IM knows diabetic medicine because they happen to run into it a fair amount, along with a lot of other diseases from a lot of other body systems like kidney disease or COPD, but they're not nephrologists or pulmonologists either.
So you offer the newer, better treatments for free, right? Right???
That's the neat part, you don't.
What’s worse - taking diabetes medication that’s somewhat outdated, or taking no diabetes medication at all?
I’m not a doctor, but I bet I know the answer.
Also most of those newer treatments treat either type 2 (diet / metabolism related) or are an adjunct therapy for a type 1 (genetic) who has also developed insulin resistance over time. With or without insulin resistance a type 1 isn't making any insulin in their pancreas at ALL and is going to need to take manufactured insulin, whether by a syringe or with an artificial pancreas that needs to be filled with an insulin cartridge. For them a metabolism altering medication isn't going to make their pancreas start producing insulin again, it's just going to help their cells respond better to the insulin they still have to inject.
People have gotten so used to conceptualizing diabetes as a "fat people" disease that they completely ignore the type 1 genetic diabetics who are actually the main users of insulin. Oh and most children with diabetes have type 1 (since it's genetic) vs type 2 which can be managed with the fancier newer drugs is the "fat people" / diet related type, and most people don't get that until they're at least middle aged and have been eating garbage for decades. When people talk about insulin they act like they're talking about adults who made a choice when most of your exclusively insulin dependent diabetics are gonna be type 1s who got it from genetics and have had it since childhood.
We should absolutely be caring about people regardless of these moralistic fat shaming arguments but the kind of people saying it's not a big deal that a month of insulin costs $500 are also usually the same people crying "think of the children!" and the raw hypocrisy of that just drives me fucking bonkers.
Yes. Thank you. I have T1, and with T2 being ~20 times as common, I don’t think the difference will ever be understood by the public. I wish it would get a different name, though that wouldn’t lower the price of insulin, right.
same here. If type 1's dont take insulin they die, period. Symptom onset is fast and its not a pleasant or fast death. All the type1s rationing insulin are cooking their organs and in some stage of the process of dying, and they feel it happening. The only option is to not eat any food at all and hope you can make the process of dying stretch out a bit. But as soon as you eat, the food turns to glucose (sugar) in the blood, your body cant use that sugar without insulin and it acidifies in your blood and cooks you.
Right. I starved even with food in T1 onset and then later got DKA, which was excruciating.
Except if diabetics had cheap safe access to insulin none of them would die………..
The point it seems like they are trying to make (and I have only read up till the paywall) is that there are multiple forms of insulin, and newer versions basically work better. Many people are getting the newer, better drugs, but having to ration them because of how expensive they are. If plain, old insulin becomes cheap enough such that people switch to it (critically, without some extra effort by our healthcare system), a percentage of people will end up dying. Managing diabetes is all about keeping blood glucose stable, and that is asier to do with the modern stuff.
They retitled the article to "Making Insulin Cheaper Isn’t Enough", which i think is a much better headline.
And again, I could only read up till the paywall, so i could be giving them too much credit.
The old forms of insulin (R, NPH) are already cheap and available at Walmart without a prescription. They are only $25 a vial, but suck to use though. Pretty sure they’re referring to the metabolic drugs given to people with type 2.
The fact they changed the headline is itself praiseworthy, but the fact it was click bait and sensationalist to begin counters it.
The point about making the older stuff cheaper is something that isn't mentioned as much as it should be in these debates.
Ultimately even if the older stuff is worse and requires more attention and monitoring (less convenient), it is still better than nothing.
If diabetics get insulin for free they'd become dependent and require it for the rest of their lives. It's safer to just let them die or leave them homeless because they have to spend all their money on it.
~/s~
The title of the article is clickbait/ragebait. The actual article content is a little different. The gist of it is more so this:
In place of capping the out-of-pocket cost of just insulin, lawmakers should cap the out-of-pocket cost of all diabetes medications.
Headline writters are often/usually different people than the person who wrote the article leading to infuriating things like this
Michael Rose
Any society which holds “your money or your life” as a valid argument is not one which should exist.
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.
If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.
Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!
0. Only post socialist memes
That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)
1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here
Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.
2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such
That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.
3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.
That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).
4. No Bigotry.
The only dangerous minority is the rich.
5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.
(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)
6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.
