😂

🤣👌

No. It's only about the kernel itself, not Linux Systems(aka Distributions).

Earlier the kernel did only consist of C code, but for some time now the option to develop parts of the kernel in Rust is being worked on. In the end it both compiles to native machine code, meaning the running kernel does not require the Rust toolchain to be present.

The other commenter already answers your quest, but I will just point out that python doesn't come included "on Linux". It just happens to be a dependency of so much stuff that some other packages is going to pull it in. A minimal distro which doesn't include programs written in python will probably not have python installed at all.

This only means programmers of Linux itself can use Rust to program the Kernel. In example if Rust programmers are good at it, they can use the language over something they are not good at it like C in example. You as the end user does not see any direct difference. Like with any other application if its written in Rust or in C, it does not matter much if you use the binary executable.

Rust libs for use in the kernel need an extra approval. But it turns out, whenever it's easier to just include a dependency doing what you need, instead of writing a bad version of it yourself, most people take a dependency.

Hey man, if you want to understand something you have to see it for yourself.

Don't just look at online forums and try to discern what's factual. You need your own experience.

Do you think the AI was just fed the title to make an image, and successfully combined "rust" and "os"?

Bsd