369
submitted 2 days ago by JOMusic@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 19 points 2 days ago

How is this Open Source? The official repository https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 contains images only, a PDF file, and links to download the model. I don't see any code. What exactly is Open Source here? And if so, where to get the source code?

[-] JOMusic@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago

Open-Source in AI usually posted to HuggingFace instead of GitHub: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1

[-] v_krishna@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 days ago

In deep learning generally open source doesn't include actual training or inference code. Rather it means they publish the model weights and parameters (necessary to run it locally/on your own hardware) and publish academic papers explaining how the model was trained. I'm sure Stallman disagrees but from the standpoint of deep learning research DeepSeek definitely qualifies as an "open source model"

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 24 points 2 days ago

Just because they call it Open Source does not make it. DeepSeek is not Open Source, it only provides model weights and parameters, not any source code and training data. I still don't know whats in the model and we only get "binary" data, not any source code. This is not Libre software.

[-] Sal@mander.xyz 16 points 2 days ago

There is a nice (even if by now already a bit outdated) analysis about the openness of different "open source" generative AI projects in the following article: Liesenfeld, Andreas, and Mark Dingemanse. "Rethinking open source generative AI: open washing and the EU AI Act." The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 2024.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago
[-] bokherif@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

To be fair its correct but it's poor writing to skip the self hosted component. These articles target the company not the model.

[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

There are many llms you can use offline

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
369 points (94.7% liked)

Open Source

32388 readers
638 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS