929
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Rational people pay attention to unarmed peaceful protestors...

But the people in power aren't rational, and the boots on the ground attack if protestors are unarmed...

Vests and rifles are going to be necessary optics at protests for the foreseeable future.

Quick edit:

Obligatory, "I think my draco might be gay"

[-] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Look at the smile on that person's face. The world needs more of that person.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago

I was really hoping for something more impressive than a sticker.

[-] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago

Something more like the Hello Kitty AR-15?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

Yes! Guns deserve more colors than black, blued steel, and wood.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Looks like just some trans tape wrapped around the mag.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago

I don't get the take here.

Is this bad because....they had a gun?

Or is it bad because the gun had a transgender flag?

Aren't they all for gun rights?

[-] prayer@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

They're for gun rights within the scope of their interpretation of the constitution. It's starts out "We the people" and when you don't consider someone a person, you don't consider them to have those same rights.

[-] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

You make the fatal flaw of thinking there's reasoning behind their beliefs. They make up reasons to justify their beliefs. These reasons are always narrow-in-scope and context-dependant, but are often presented as generalized statements. They will change their argument to suit their aims.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago

rules for thee and not for me

[-] Reyali@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Before I noticed the source, I just thought, “Badass!” Then I had the same question as you.

[-] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Any recommendations for a decent plate carrier?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 1 day ago

Is this where the white people twitter exodus gonna land?

[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

I mean it literally says whitepeopletwitter under its logo, and name, atop the side bar, so yeah, probably should expect that

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 day ago

do they even know to come here tho... reddit out reach is becoming very hard, can't make anon accounts, can't make account without fingerprinting...

[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh I expect most to go elsewhere, but the portion that end up on lemmy, after doing a search for reddit alternatives, will end up here. The greater portion probably won't end up at a single place, as there aren't any reddit alternatives in the way that reddit was an alternative to digg.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago
[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s impossible to tell because of low resolution image, but the “AK-47” or Type 1/2/3 AK hasn't been made in 70 years, and are very rare nowadays. Due to popular media, what most people think of when they hear AK-47 is the AKM, a cheaper and mass produced variant of the 7.62 AK, which this could be, but its more likely this is not a Russian-made rifle (only ~10-15% of AKs are Russian-made).

[-] BleakBluets@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

This sounds like the Linux vs GNU/Linux meme.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Courtesy of DeepSeek R1:14B

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as the AK-47 is, in fact, Kalashnikov's Automatic Rifle, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Kalashnikov plus 7.62×39mm. The AK-47 is not a firearm unto itself, but rather another essential component of a fully functioning infantry weapon system made effective by its rugged design, intermediate cartridge, and gas-operated action, comprising a complete platform as defined by modern military doctrine.

Many firearm enthusiasts use a modified version of the Kalashnikov rifle every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the rifle originally designated as the AK-47 has evolved into the AKM and other derivatives, and many of its users are not aware that what they are handling is basically the original AK design, refined by Mikhail Kalashnikov’s engineering.

There really is an AK-47, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they rely on. The AK-47 is the foundation: the mechanism in the rifle that cycles rounds and provides reliability in extreme conditions. The receiver, barrel, and bolt carrier group are essential parts of a firearm, but useless by themselves; they can only function in the context of a complete rifle assembly. The AK-47 is normally used in combination with its 7.62×39mm ammunition and stamped steel receiver: the whole system is essentially Kalashnikov’s rifle with these elements added, or Kalashnikov/7.62. All the so-called AK variants are really just derivatives of Kalashnikov’s original masterpiece!

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I just got "Aykshually'd" by an AI.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago

That’s actually so good

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AK-47's also look like black colored pencils.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 6 points 1 day ago

!socialistra@midwest.social

[-] bestagon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This machine…

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago

Im completely against guns but still i have to admit that the trans ak47 is cool

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
929 points (98.6% liked)

People Twitter

5785 readers
2917 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS