328
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

At the current rate of horrible fiery deaths, FuelArc projects the Cybertruck will have 14.52 fatalities per 100,000 units — far eclipsing the Pinto's 0.85. (In absolute terms, FuelArc found, 27 Pinto drivers died in fires, while five Cybertruck drivers have suffered the same fate, at least so far.)

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Garbage in, garbage out

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

What a dumpster fire that truck is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 3 months ago

Seems like natural selection in progress.

Buy a Cybertruck, fuck around, see what happens.

It also handily preselects for douche.

[-] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Can we like, mark this as NSFW?

[-] nwilz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The pinto is a myth

Pintos represented 1.9% of all cars on the road in the 1975–76 period. During that time, the car represented 1.9% of all "fatal accidents accompanied by some fire". This implies the Pinto was average for all cars and slightly above average for its class.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto#Retrospective_safety_analysis

[-] ajsg@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Why are we talkaing about this? Who needs this sheet?

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

And some people wonder why the cybertruck is barely sold outside the US.

Everything I hear about this thing is bad.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It's barely sold outside the US because other places (like the EU) also care about the safety of people outside the vehicle. That's why European and Asian cars (except the models explicitly for the US market like the Tacoma) are designed for pedestrians to be deflected, while US cars are a moving brick wall which will squish them like a bug.

Also, I suspect you'd need commercial plates and a special license to drive it most other places, due to the weight.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Do you have a reasonable alternative solution to teach pedestrians lessons?

Edit: (/s)

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Pedestrians would probably learn more from the experience if they don't die.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

^(^^s^^o^^r^^r^^y^ ^d^^r^^o^^p^^p^^e^^d^ ^/^^s^^)^

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

keep in mind that while the cybertruck might seem like a bad vehicle, it also is a bad vehicle

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Yuriq@feddit.rocks 0 points 3 months ago
[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

No. Shit. Sherlock.

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

god bless American auto regulations for allowing unique vehicles on the road (and the ability to sue for damages when the idiot driver hits you)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
328 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

70302 readers
2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS