Boycott the Superbowl and still watch (ppv.land)

submitted 1 year ago by n3m37h@sh.itjust.works to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Enjoy

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] three@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago

It's not a boycott if you're still interacting with the product. Call it what it is, a pirated sports stream.

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 year ago

they’re making efforts to not financially enrich those involved. A step in the right direction, at least

[-] three@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

And I'm not saying that's wrong, I've been watching sports streams for over 10 years now. But let's not act like this is some grand social gesture, I just don't want to pay for cable.

[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

How do you do this without still having to see the commercials? Those are a huge part of the enriching unfortunately...

[-] centof@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Lots of these streams don't show the commercials and instead just have blank airspace when the commercials are airing. But I don't know if that applies to the superbowl streams though since some people like to watch those commercials.

[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

Oh snap, so pulling from pre network... Or just very determined.

My hatred of commercials is... Strong. Kudos to black screens of comforting non-crap.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

It's more that they're restreaming a stream, and the main stream doesn't have commercials. They're injected at commercial breaks, but aren't a part of the main stream (because people in different regions get different commercials).

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep lot of sports streams I've seen straight up don't have commercials and goes to dead air during breaks, since they aren't streaming regular broadcast channels.

Really nice ones switch to stadium cameras during breaks so showing what's going on with the crowd and arena.

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

You could also rip the stream, manually remove the commercials, and post it on torrent sites

Be the change you want to see in the world

[+] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[removed by mod]

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

AF is considered to be the world's most dangerous sport if you look at number of injuries weighted by severity. If you ask me, that's precisely why it's a "terrible sport". Insinuating it's lacking in some degree of toxic masculinity simply sounds ignorant.

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the joke, this is my actual belief. The more "padded" someone is the more careless they will be because they think they are safe.

I certainly know rugby has its dangers, but when you play by the rules it is leaps and bounds safer than AF

[-] stardust@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There was a time they played without helmets and

Between 1965 and 1969, more than 100 players at all levels died of brain injuries, an average of about 20 per year—about the same number as died in 1905, but from brain injuries alone.

https://www.chicagomag.com/city-life/may-2012/a-brief-history-of-football-head-injuries-and-a-look-towards-the-future/

So it's just a stupid sport to begin with whether there is padding or not due to the whole bashing into each other from opposite ends every single play.

[-] Vanth@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

I've always hated that "rugby is a hooligan's game played by gentlemen" claptrap because too many who play are insufferable jackasses with an unwarranted superiority complex.

Be confident enough in your sport you don't need to belittle others. There's room in the world for more than one sport.

Allez les Bleus

Go Chiefs

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I just enjoy pissing off football fans. You want to talk superiority complex just look at American football fans.

Anyways, enjoy what ya enjoy lol

[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 2 points 1 year ago

all sportsball is terrible but it's a proven fact that safety equipment increases risk taking behaviour.

[-] n3m37h@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

Rugby safety equiptment - Scrum cap (only 2nd row wear these), mouth guard, training how to tackle/be tackled.

How much safer can ya get??

[-] Vanth@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Websearch "rugby + CTE".

Rugby is a full contact sport and has the exact same concerns that American football, fighting, and hockey have. There is no magic shield that protects rugby players from the consequences of repeat impacts to the head.

Researchers are looking into high volume, low impact hits (rugby and American football) contributing to CTE just as much as lower volume, high impact hits (American football). Researchers are even looking at whether impact is necessary, even rapid changes in acceleration (hit elsewhere in the body causing ones brain to slosh around in the skull) piles up damage over the course of a sports career.

Plenty of good hearted sledging to be thrown about various sports. Buying the propaganda that rugby isn't a dangerous sport ain't it.

[-] veniasilente@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

How much safer can ya get??

Like in Monster Hunter: hit, don't get hit.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Not sure I understand the boycott but still watch crowd. Sure, not watching makes viewership go down a tick, but the Superbowl is so cultural, every hallway "did you see the game" helps push those viewership numbers right back up

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago

My response would be "what game?"

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

But would you still watch anyways? It seems silly to me to watch a game you're boycotting then just go around pretending you didn't. Who did you watch for? Who are you actually lying to?