4

"In a ruling submitted today, Judge Corley said the following:

Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision has been described as the largest in tech history. It deserves scrutiny. That scrutiny has paid off: Microsoft has committed in writing, in public, and in court to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation for 10 years on parity with Xbox. It made an agreement with Nintendo to bring Call of Duty to Switch. And it entered several agreements to for the first time bring Activision’s content to several cloud gaming services. This Court’s responsibility in this case is narrow. It is to decide if, notwithstanding these current circumstances, the merger should be halted—perhaps even terminated—pending resolution of the FTC administrative action. For the reasons explained, the Court finds the FTC has not shown a likelihood it will prevail on its claim this particular vertical merger in this specific industry may substantially lessen competition. To the contrary, the record evidence points to more consumer access to Call of Duty and other Activision content. The motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore DENIED. "

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

As far as poison goes, I'd much rather pick Phil Spencer over Bobby Kotick.

[-] icogniito@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

While I absolutely hate the fact that the gaming industry is being consolidated into a few massive corps, I am very excited for the entire Activision Blizzard umbrella to be under new leadership.

[-] gamer@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Irrelevant. The FTC knew and had no issues so why do you?

[-] gamer@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

Read the linked article for some good potential reasons it's an issue (e.g. Microsoft has been doing a lot of layoffs recently, why is her son still employed?)

But that was written before the ruling. Now that we have it, her ties to Microsoft offer at least one potential explanation to the nonsense of the decision (IMO, obviously).

For an excellent write up on what happened, check out Matt Stoler's recent article.

[-] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Microsoft has been doing a lot of layoffs recently, why is her son still employed?

Last article I found said they laid off less than 1% of theor staff. It would be weird if he was layed off.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago

Lol so the only reason he wasn’t laid off is because of his mum? What are you basing that off?

[-] gamer@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

I know reading is hard bro, but give it another go.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago

As soon as anyone even brings that up they’ve lost any argument or debate they are in.

[-] LeHappStick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They'll go nuts on mobile gaming, I saw it on youtube

[-] giantofthenorth@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

What's the point of all these lawsuits over mergers when every single time there is clearly a monopolistic merger it just goes through anyways.

[-] Goronmon@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

The issue in this instance is that's its hard to prove that a company not even close to leading to the market is going to somehow dominate that market through a single (albeit large) acquisition.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

It's not a "single" acquisition though. Microsoft have been acquiring huge companies (Bethesda, for example), hit games (Minecraft), and key development parters from competition (remember Rare?) from the beginning of Xbox.

To think that they spent all of those billions of dollars to buy out everything but that they aren't going to use that to benefit their platforms, is just crazy to me.

Just like they said in one of their internal emails, they are in a unique position to spend their competition out of business, and the entire industry will be worse for it.

[-] Goronmon@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Microsoft have been acquiring huge companies (Bethesda, for example), hit games (Minecraft), and key development parters from competition (remember Rare?) from the beginning of Xbox.

And yet, they are still in third place in the gaming market behind Sony and Nintendo. If those acquisitions didn't turn Microsoft into a monopoly already, what will be significantly different if they acquire AVB?

[-] TheAndrewBrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Theoretically, the way it works is each one of those sales should go through until you hit the one that would push them over the edge to monopoly. You don’t block a purchase because of purchases you expect them to make in the future (unless stuff has already been signed)

[-] elouboub@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

If they start banning everything Activision makes from Steam, Gog, or other stores, then probably they'll get a nice lawsuit. But tbh, if you don't like Microsoft, then don't buy Microsoft products and that will henceforth include Activision products.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Sure. But then Microsoft will buy Sega so you shouldn't buy Sega products either. And then Microsoft will buy Capcom, so you can't buy Capcom products either. So then Microsoft will buy SquareEnix so y-

Wait guys, I think corporate consolidation might be bad.

[-] echoplex21@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

I know a lot of people (rightfully) are against it . But the way Activision/Blizzard has been run has been shambles and needs at least some kind of change. Plus the scrutiny has lead to several concessions by MS that will help curtail future antitrust issues for the most part.

[-] LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They're run more effectively than Microsoft has run their gaming division for the past ~15 years or so... Microsoft's gaming leadership has seen one of the most valuable gaming IPs, Halo, flounder again and again and again. They closed all their game studios and spent a whole generation with minimal first party exclusives, they did I don't know how much damage to Arkane with Redfall...

More generally, Microsoft's approach to leading their game studios is to leave them to run the way the studio was ran pre-acquisition. Activision-Blizzard is not going to see major changes to the way they run if this deal does go through (pending CMA). Microsoft will Activision to be run the way it is now, and only intervene if profits dip too much (considering Halo, though, that might take quite the dip).

I don't get the assumption that Activision is going to see some major cleanup from this. They won't.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago

they did I don’t know how much damage to Arkane with Redfall…

Microsoft aren't to blame for Redfall. Redfall started development in 2018 but Microsoft didn't buy them til 2021. Redfall sucks because Arkane Austin made a bad game without any input from MS.

Microsoft didn't close all their studios either. In fact they've barely closed any actual studios that have made xbox games. They closed ones that were bad though. Lionhead closed because Fable Legends was bad. I was in the beta, and it was not a good game. It would have absolutely flopped and killed the studio. They closed Ensemble almost 15 years ago. That's about it really.

[-] sorenant@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Devs can do no wrong, it's always the publishers.

[-] Whirlybird@aussie.zone -1 points 2 years ago

Well in that case it’s still not Microsoft, it’s Bethesda.

[-] MrNesser@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

RIP any new blizzard games in the UK

[-] BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago

The CMA agreed to negotiate so I think it's likely that a deal will be made soon. The UK doesn't want to be left out

[-] QubaXR@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Oh great, more consolidation and monopoly building.

[-] Grimr0c@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

'Tis the era of Indy Games, my friend. Abandon the Graphically amazing games that cannot be built upon passion due to have dev teams of 10,000 strong. Instead, embrace the smaller titles developed by less than 10 people whom cry with joy at the prospect of showering you with entertainment and art.

[-] Poob@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

Companies should not be allowed to buy other companies

[-] LeHoz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago
[-] Poob@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

Because it leads to 6 companies making 95% of the food we eat

[-] GreenAlex@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago

It's amazing to me how short-sighted this decision is. Yeah sure keep wide access to CoD for 10 years to get the FTC off their back and then watch all that fall away immediately after. For us this is potentially decent gains in the short term but certainly contributes to this industry turning to crap long term.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
4 points (83.3% liked)

Games

40846 readers
209 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS