I use a 28" inch 4K screen and I regularly use virtual desktops for various kinds of things. I don’t think monitor size and/or resolution affects me at all. I did the same on a 22" 1080p screen.

~~On extended sessions of zoning out the whole night~~ When doing some important coding late in the evening sometimes 3-4 desktops are plastered with windows – editors in different files at different positions, browsers for research, multiple terminal emulators, and at least one desktop only having one browser open on YouTube playing a random music playlist from my main page.

All seemingly random placed and resized, but to me it all makes absolute sense.

I use two monitors, and also KDE's virtual desktops for work. A killer feature for me is that KDE has a window manager option to "pin" specific windows so that they are present on every desktop. This means I can have my terminal and slack client split across one screen and pinned, and then the other screen can contain my "main focus" on each of the virtual desktops - browser, editor, or email. I always can see the chat/terminal but can easily swap the desktop to get to a different focus.

I know that I could just have everything on one desktop and use the alt-tab to change that main window. But the alt tab is slow and non-deterministic. I may have to cycle between five things before I get to the browser, for example. With virtual desktops, I know where each focus is geometrically, and I can always swap over quickly with my key shortcuts.

I don't like workspaces. It may be due to my asymmetric vision, but I need to have two or more screens with the data I'm going back and forth with. With hobbyist embedded stuff like Arduino, I need the datasheet and IDE side by side to be effective and laptop screens are too small for tiling IMO, even my 17's (1080p) don't cut it. Maybe my next with a higher resolution will be better.

I use them like browser tabs so I've had like 20-30 going at once before on sway.

Workspaces might be a bit overkill if you're only switching between two-ish windows. For more you might find a benefit to using workspaces, especially if you group windows related to specific tasks, or if your brain likes having windows "stored" spatially.

Yes. I love them. For laptops that are not currently connected to more screens invaluable, for other usecases with more monitors, very useful

Im trying to make myself use it but i usually forget it exists. I grew up using Windows XP and i still use every OS/DE like its XP.

I use them constantly on laptop with GNOME. It makes it easier to switch windows with touchpad. On desktop I don't use them so often, because I forget about them.

It's strange, I really loved them when I ran i3. But now I'm forced on Windows I practically never use them. Some combination of the shortcuts not being as intuitive to me and tiled windows not being the default takes it from useful and intuitive to useless for me. At some point I may try again.

Virtual Desktops haven't really been a thing that I've really needed in my work flow. Maybe one day I will give using one a shot. I actually prefer my current setup with dual 27" monitors.

I use them on both. I use more of them (6) on my desktop, and I use them more often, but only because I'm usually doing several tasks on my desktop while my laptop is for more casual use and I only require two or three. I mostly use Gnome and bind Win Key+Num for each workspace.

For me it's all about focus. Screen #1 is general usage. #2 is client #1. #3 is client #2. #4 is camera from my door.

I work with a random jumble of windows, it's about as effective as you'd think

All the time on both my laptop and my 4 screen desktop. I use swaysome with sway to get awesome wm style workspaces for sway.

I use workspaces regularly. Typically a browser in one, terminal in one, and the third is where I put whatever else I'm currently working with which could be dolphin and maybe gimp or an IDE, whatever the other is might be in the moment but browser and full screen terminal in separate workspaces are daily standard.

Not gonna lie. I have 5 monitors and forget the workspaces exist. It would make life so much easier if I started using the.

I have a 3x3 desktop grid in plasma, it works great for me on my laptop, but I don't think I could use it without touchpad gestures. I would probably have less or none if I had a big screen.

With a 27" monitor, I feel like there’s enough space

*looks at the second monitor I bought because the 49" ultrawide "wasn't enough space"...

I might be ignoring some useful features... sips tea

I'm exactly the opposite. I use use virtual desktops when I have my MBP docked to multiple screens--and when I am just using the laptop, I don't. I have gestures enabled on my Magic Mouse and Magic Trackpad--so the gestures are there whether I'm using the laptop or docked--but I just don't use them when I have the single monitor...

I use workspaces everyday as a context switcher for related apps and programs. An example would be a "main focus" workspace that includes whatever project I'm working along including any relevant documentation or browser windows. When it's time to take a break, I have a separate workspace for stuff like kbin or messaging platforms.

Another consideration is that I’m always using a mouse on my desktop, so switching between workspaces with the keyboard wouldn’t feel as natural.

I use hot corners for this reason. Dragging my mouse to one of the corners of the screen brings up the workspaces interface.

I switched to sway on both my lapto (13" 1080p) and desktop (27" 1440) to force myself on using workspaces, and man i have to say I was missing out a lot, now I thinking of giving Hyprland a try to for dynamic tiling which sound fantastic especially for bigger screens.

Always, because you get to assign keyboard shortcuts to each one (and then use each one for a dedicated purpose). Much faster workflow than alt-tabbing your way through an arbitary list of programs.